Busi-Bee.com Website Quality of Service Report for Monday, October 2nd, 2006

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Best Buy provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 100.000%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 95.569%.

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) October 3, 2006 -- For this report made on Monday, October 2nd, 2006, Busi-Bee.com took 18391 samples from the websites of Best Buy, Apple Computer, Amazon.com, Overstock.com, Alcatel, and Lucent during the entire day of Sunday, October 1st, 2006, and analyzed the data to compile the following results in order of best QoS to worse, precluded by an overall summary as follows;

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Best Buy provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 100.000%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 95.569%

Best Buy has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 100.000%. The best response hour was at 3pm with minimum and average latencies of 0.080247 and 0.193180 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7am with latencies of 5.151922 and 0.396397 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.219 with a mean latency of 0.126 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Apple Computer has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 100.000%. The best response hour was at 12am with minimum and average latencies of 0.058016 and 0.209263 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7am with latencies of 5.276765 and 0.360976 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.229 with a mean latency of 0.101 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Amazon.com has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.913%. The best response hour was at 5am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080439 and 0.888834 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7am with latencies of 10.020593 and 1.402595 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.940 with a mean latency of 0.279 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Overstock.com has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.565%. The best response hour was at 12am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080558 and 0.428520 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 8am with latencies of 181.578565 (we consider this unreachable) and 7.949632 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.951 with a mean latency of 3.779 seconds, we consider this bad site delivery consistency for the day. This is usually the result of some server down time within the day.

Alcatel has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.391%. The best response hour was at 11am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080942 and 0.883756 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 11.311885 and 0.897672 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.617 with a mean latency of 0.206 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Lucent has provided their site users with what we deem as pretty good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 95.569%. The best response hour was at 4am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080330 and 1.311643 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 6pm with latencies of 183.874668 (we consider this unreachable) and 8.884447 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 2.038 with a mean latency of 3.814 seconds, we consider this slightly erratic site delivery consistency for the day.

Disclaimer

This report is deemed accurate but due to the nature of networks and their underlying systems, in no way does it guarantee the quality of any individual user's browsing experience to any of the sites listed in this report. Note that all times shown are UTC.

About Busi-Bee.com

Busi-Bee.com provides host, network and protocol monitoring services with built in web analytics, and is based in San Diego, CA, with servers distributed across the US continent. Visit http://www.busi-bee.com/reports/ for the current QoS publication. To monitor your website, visit http://www.busi-bee.com/ and sign up today!

Copyright ©2006, Busi-Bee.com

# # #