Busi-Bee.com website quality of service report for Saturday, October 14th, 2006

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO) provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 100.000%, while Lucent (NYSE: LU) had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 93.194%

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) October 15, 2006 -- For this report made on Saturday, October 14th, 2006, Busi-Bee.com took 17986 samples from the websites of Yahoo, Overstock.com, Google, Microsoft, CNET Networks, and Lucent during the entire day of Friday, October 13th, 2006, and analyzed the data to compile the following results in order of best QoS to worse, precluded by an overall summary as follows;

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Yahoo provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 100.000%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 93.194%

Yahoo has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 100.000%. The best response hour was at 9pm with minimum and average latencies of 0.061459 and 0.239308 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 4pm with latencies of 2.539968 and 0.220002 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.181 with a mean latency of 0.082 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Overstock.com has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.913%. The best response hour was at 12pm with minimum and average latencies of 0.080223 and 0.526538 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 6.349281 and 0.732243 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.551 with a mean latency of 0.191 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Google has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.913%. The best response hour was at 8am with minimum and average latencies of 0.044097 and 0.135630 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 12pm with latencies of 7.030550 and 0.310131 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.165 with a mean latency of 0.100 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Microsoft has provided their site users with what we deem as very good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 97.483%. The best response hour was at 4am with minimum and average latencies of 0.050963 and 0.244893 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 12pm with latencies of 42.694845 (we consider this unreachable) and 4.448546 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.633 with a mean latency of 2.130 seconds, we consider this bad site delivery consistency for the day. This is usually the result of some server down time within the day.

CNET Networks has provided their site users with what we deem as pretty good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 95.735%. The best response hour was at 4am with minimum and average latencies of 0.000518 and 0.304965 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 6pm with latencies of 14.674634 and 2.740168 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.778 with a mean latency of 1.219 seconds, we consider this good site delivery consistency for the day.

Lucent has provided their site users with what we deem as good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 93.194%. The best response hour was at 12am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080729 and 2.166144 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 11am with latencies of 71.985966 (we consider this unreachable) and 3.636032 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 2.035 with a mean latency of 1.157 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Disclaimer

This report is deemed accurate but due to the nature of networks and their underlying systems, in no way does it guarantee the quality of any individual user's browsing experience to any of the sites listed in this report. Note that all times shown are UTC.

About Busi-Bee.com

Busi-Bee.com provides host, network and protocol monitoring services with built in web analytics, and is based in San Diego, CA, with servers distributed across the US continent. Visit http://www.busi-bee.com/reports/ for the current QoS publication. To monitor your website, visit http://www.busi-bee.com/ and sign up today!

Copyright ©2006, Busi-Bee.com

###