Cover-ups of National Health Service Murders by the United Kingdom Government, Home Office, Police & Coroners Courts for organs, research, budgets and savings.

Massive evidence given by doctors at the inquest of Baby Sunaina on 11 September 2001 would suggest tha she died as a result of deliberate drug overdose and lethal poisoning, yet the Coroner directed the jury to conclude "natural causes". The baby's body lies frozen in a mortuary since 26/10/2000 awaiting location and return of its internal organs including eyes. The family are being ignored whilst the accused continue to work within the NHS. Here is the transcript of the inquest as provided by the Coroner, Dr Elizabeth Stearns.

Copied to MP's John Denham, Alan Milburn, Jack Straw; PM Tony Blair; Police Commissioner, Sir John Stevens; local and national press; petition supporters; and posted on public noticeboards nationally in the UK and internationally.

Nearly 12,000 members of the public from all over the world have signed the petition for a public inquiry into the death of Baby Sunaina; over 25,000 have visited the website www.nhsmurders.co.uk; with local press (Ilford Recorder, Ilford & Redbridge Post), National press (The Times 27/11/2000 & Sikh Times 03/10/2002 & 21/11/2002) and international press (The Monitor, Nigeria, 30/11/2002) coverage, and massive evidence of an unlawful death given at an inquest on 11/09/2001 by doctors, no British doctor or nurse has been prosecuted for this alleged murder of a 5 month old baby girl for research into her organs. No libel action has been taken against the family since 26/10/2000 because of the massive evidence that the baby's organs were taken 4 days before the post-mortem, after allegations of an unlawful killing were made to the Police and the Coroner.

Quotes from the transcript of the inquest provided by the Home Office Coroner, Walthamstow Coroners Court, who also is a qualified doctor, dentist and lawyer, Dr Elizabeth Stearns shows how inquest verdicts are routinely falsified as "natural causes", how massive evidence of an unlawful killing is ignored, encouraging doctors to kill NHS patients for organs, budgets and savings:-

1. Ranitidine overdose

"CORONER:On Wednesday the 4th. October when Sunaina was administered 10 times the prescribed dose of ranitidine on Clover Ward for a few days 30mgs instead of 3. Do you know anything about that? ...Would 30mgs be harmful for a baby of this age and size ?" (P.205)

"DR ANAND SHIRSALKAR: ...ranitidine is normally given 1mg per kilo. So 30mg is an overdose if that is what was given". (P. 205).

2. Lethal Potassium Chloride

"CORONER:They also were concerned about the giving of Potassium, that exercise's their minds considerably, was potassium been added to her feeds as a supplement?

"DR ANAND SHIRSALKAR: I'am not aware of it

"CORONER:It is not anything you would prescribe?

"DR ANAND SHIRSALKAR: No

"CORONER:And what would be the effect of excess of Potassium on baby?

"DR ANAND SHIRSALKAR: Potassium is a very important electrolyte, high potassium can cause rhythm disturbances to the heart, and actually the heart could stop. If it was too much potassium.

CORONER CHANGES THE SUBJECT:-

"CORONER:So you would refute their allegations that baby was denied liquids?

"NURSE CATHY ELLIGFORD:... She was on a potassium supplement 4.7 mls which she had that morning and signed for. That was given in the feed, but it had only been prescribed the night before for the first time.

..."DR JUNAID SOLEBO: I noticed she had stopped breathing all of a sudden.

3. Evidence cleared from scene before family arrived

"CORONER:And the Detective Inspector on the scene directed steps to preserve and manage the scene. In fact the room had been cleared of medical treatment prior to the arrival of the family?

"DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT GIBSON: Yes, but we have interpreted that as a fairly standard procedure.

"CORONER:Yes. We heard that that was standard so the family is not surrounded by tubes so they can see their baby. But was the equipment, I know the clothing worn by her was taken.

4. Coroner's Judicial Undertaking before Inquest to let the jury decide the verdict

"Sunaina's family has made numerous allegations against hospital staff, Police and myself about a conspiracy to kill Sunaina, and conceal the evidence and impede any investigation. These allegations have been made to the local M.P. the Coroner's section of the Home Office, the Home Secretary, and the Police Complaints Authority and published on web-site, which is regularly updated and in flyers left around the hospital where Sunaina died. Consequently I have chosen to sit with a jury because as I will explain to you later, it is members of the jury who judge the facts. You will be specifically directed to disregard any emphasis you may think I placed on the facts in the course of my summing up"

5. End of Inquest - Coroner invites lawyers from King George Hospital (Harrison) and Great Ormond Street Hospital (Thomas):-"CORONER:Now before I sum up, I must ask you do you wish to address me as to the law?

"HARRISON: I may do madam."

6. Coroner sends the jury out of the courtroom

"CORONER: This is your opportunity to do so in that case. Members of the jury it looks like a point of law may have arisen, I am sorry to make you get up again but could you please return to your jury room. I don't anticipate it taking very long.

"Harrison: Thank you madam. I may just want to make these very short words about the possible verdicts to which you may direct the jury to. In my submission on the basis of the witness expert and the forensic evidence given yesterday, the only verdict which can be safe to direct the jury to consider would be and to return would be natural causes. The only other possible alternative is an open verdict and in my submission on the basis of the clear evidence given yesterday this would not be a satisfactory outcome. I accept that the Coroner of course has a discretion, but would submit that you should not direct the jury to consider 'unlawful killing' as a possible verdict, as there is no evidence given yesterday to support that verdict. Whilst that it may be appropriate for the jury to consider other verdicts, in my submission no reasonable jury properly directed could reach a verdict of unlawful killing to the required standard of proof."

"CORONER: Mr Thomas do you have anything you wish to say?

"MR THOMAS: Ma'am I would like to add to my learned friend Miss Harrison's submissions, I have obviously heard your thinking of the matter, on the evidence even taking it at it's highest it's my submission that the jury properly directed could not reach a conclusion of unlawful killing in this case. And the evidence justifies only one conclusion and in that case death from natural causes.

7. Coroner breaches her juducial undertaking by giving her own possible verdicts

"CORONER: So, I have considered the verdict of unlawful killing, which I know if the family had been present they would wish to be put to you, but I have to say to you that there is no evidence on which a reasonable jury could possibly come to that conclusion.

I am now going to leave you with the two possible conclusions that you may return, and these two conclusions require a far less high standard of proof, the unlawful killing verdict requires a criminal standard of proof satisfies beyond all reasonable doubt. The two verdicts I am going to leave with you are one's which can be reached on the balance of probability, i.e., more likely than not. Now The first one is 'natural causes'

"...And The words you should use are 'she died from natural causes

"...Now the other verdict I am going to leave with you is a narrative verdict... and after consideration of all the facts you may consider that this is the appropriate verdict to return. Something like Sunaina died from multiple congenital medical problems in spite of every effort to prolong her life, by giving her all possible care. So I am going to leave you with two possible conclusions, one she died from natural causes and one so called a narrative verdict...

"CORONER: And what did you write under three for the time, place and circumstances?"

"JURY FOREMAN: Here we wrote little baby girl with Edward's syndrome before birth".

"CORONER: And what conclusion did you reach?"

"JURY FOREMAN: Natural Causes"

8. Coroner gives her own verdict, not that of the jury, as a cause of death

"CORONER: ...The Sovereign Lady the Queen this Court formally records that Sunaina Chaudhari who was born on the 25th. May 2000, who died on 26th October 2000 at King George Hospital, the cause of death been given by the jury as Multiple Congenital abnormalities including Edward's Syndrome and the conclusion of the jury is that she died from natural causes".

It is a matter of serious public concern that criminal acts are being committed and covered up routinely within the National Health Service.

Neelu Berry (Pharmacist, aunt and witness to murder) & Sadhana Chaudhari (teacher, mother and witness to murder)

EMAIL: sunaina@newsguy.com

WEBSITE: WWW.NHSMURDERS.CO.UK

http://www.nhsmurders.co.uk