(PRWEB) October 10, 2001
Is Free Energy real? If free energy is real, why aren't consumers using it? Why don't I hear or see anyone talking about Free Energy besides some crackpot at a 'hole in the wall' website or some offbeat time at a radio station?
I face these questions everyday when I deal with questions on the energy crisis and alternate energy. When I set up http://www.777-health.com it was because I know how human civilization can be so much better. I know for a fact that the economy, health, and safety of the average consumer would be much better without the influence of certain powerful self-interest groups.
If 'Free' energy technologies were announced today, it would take at least 10 to 20 years for their widespread application to be effected. This is approximately how much time we have before global economic chaos begins due to demand far exceeding the supply of oil and environmental decay becomes exponential and catastrophic. I am announcing it, today. Everyone on the face of this planet can have free electricity for the rest of their lives. The world as we know it would become a clean, spiritually oriented place in contrast.
The questions starting are those I also hear from one person I know in particular, who is a hardware/software engineer; he considers himself quite knowledgeable when it comes to physics (classical physics). In my experience with hundreds of engineers I have learned that they can be the most closed minded people in the world - even to their own detriment. This person's son was showing him how a transistorized space energy receiver works and he turned his nose up at it - at HIS OWN SON! I have found that this know-it-all, prima donna attitude is common place in people who come from "higher learning." (Tom Napier is one example.) Fortunately, there are a few exceptions.
A HUMBLE attitude is a necessary tool in understanding how free energy works while you put all the misconceptions behind you. A person who is closed minded to one idea of improving life on this planet is most likely to close off all the other ideas as long as they challenge his belief system. Even an atheist has his own belief system, whereas, he shuts out all ideas of spiritual realms and infinite dimensions even to his own detriment. (They say they only believe in science, yet people like Einstein and Tesla were firm believers in God. School also does not teach us how they worked with the military/industrial complex on classifed energy projects.) Let's admit it: Our society beginning from our parents, through the school system, through popular media stresses egocentric, closed minded behavior. The church and some civic minded groups may teach hope and altruism and our place in the universe, but how many of us keep that lesson 24 X 7?
The academic presentations are far from being humble. I challenged a few ideas in physics in my day. The instructor was never very pleased with me especially during quantum physics. Academic treatises and notions in physics are loaded with convenient explanations like the "natural leak" in classical physics. The concept of gravity, for example, is a convenience. Gravity actually represents an integral of forces such as paramagnetic, diamagnetic, scalar, unipolar, homopolar, plasmic, and a number of others. That formula of gravitational field as a function of mass, distance, and gravitational constant is a statistical average - like the elements of the periodic table and the human genome ("Gene Mappers May Have Missed Half The Genes," Matthew Herper, Forbes.com). In reality, all reactions between bodies vary slightly from the wave of academic probability that is published. THIS IS BECAUSE CLASSICAL PHYSICS ONLY TELLS HALF THE STORY.
For example, have you ever been taught in school to think of solid matter as polarized light energy or a magnet as a room temperature super conductor? Have you ever been taught the opposite of gravity which is levity? If so, you were one of the few fortunate ones who had a teacher who cared enough to demonstrate different perspectives. The concept of 'Free Energy' never grabbed any of my instructors and made me quite infamous.
If I ask you what YOU know about free energy, what is your first response?.. "Is Free Energy Real?" That's a valid question. First, we need to define the concept of 'Free' in the context of "Free Energy." I will try not to get too technical: The planets constantly revolve, with no apparent fuel source, around the sun, a star which burns constantly with no apparent fuel source. We are taking a 'Free' ride around our sun on this planet. "BUT WAIT!" You might say, "There are energy forces all around us. Gravity is one of them. We just don't see it." Ah Ha. You just answered your own question; it's not necessarily 'Free' energy. It's more like a self-sustaining kinetic system of planetary bodies in gravitometric balance with one another such that the gravitational forces transfer the potential energy to elliptical motion. Yeah, I knew you would have said that. There are scientists who work with each of those separate components of gravity everyday on a smaller, practical scale.
Most of us are familiar with alternate energy in the form of solar power, windmills, fuelcells, and the rest of it. Those are all well and good, but what happens when the sun isn't shining: You either have to rely on a large bank of batteries or go back to the grid. What happens when the wind isn't blowing: You either have to rely on a large bank of batteries or go back to the grid. What happens when the price for natural gas, the fuel source for residential fuel cells, goes sky high because the producers seem to be running out of cow dung? Wouldn't you prefer your own self sustaining generator that doesn't rely on any apparent fuel? Wouldn't you prefer to be safe from blackouts knowing that you have your own non-polluting energy source constantly running, rain, shine, or drought?
What about transportation? Now, it's officially announced: Technology that should have come and gone already about twenty years ago. Bush recently announced that he supports the production of hydrogen fueled cars. End of Story. Next, the media examines how manufacturers are designing the hydrogen fueled cars. OK. Now, someone please tell me how soon the average person will be able to afford such a 'futuristic' car. Someone also please tell me what the insurance would be like on one of these mini Hindenburgs (with the interchangeable body no less). The explosion of a compressed hydrogen tank on impact would be tremendous, so would the insurance. Do you believe that the knowledge of having an on board hydrogen tank would cause people to drive safer? Cars are dangerous enough, but that doesn't stop us. That's why we need insurance. Of course, a hydrogen fueled car can be built safely, but would unscrupulous insurers and manufacturers profit from that?
What about the fuel? I only saw the media talk about on board oxygen and hydrogen tanks: A Double Mini Hindenburg. From the looks of the current designs, these tanks are not exactly small. Is the average person supposed to know how to fuel up at a self-service, highly explosive gas station? Will we need a degree in chemistry just to fuel such a beast?
Please tell me: Is anyone considering an on board fission reactor that only produces the amount of H2 and O2 fuel which is required? There are a number of applications which are small enough and can perform this duty safely. There is one energy generating system by Ronald Papineau (U.S. Patent #3,967,589; July 6 1976) which produces hydrogen. The only fuel required to power this system is pure water. As you can imagine the H2, O2 engine would produce H2O which would, in turn, feed Papineau's hydrogen generator. This is only one way of building a safer, self-perpetuating system.
This is also a system that should have been on the market at least twenty years ago if people were not so confounded.
Another engine which is even less expensive and safer to drive than today's internal combustion engine is Tesla's Turbine Engine (U.S. patent No. 1,061,206; 1909!). Getting a car with a Tesla Turbine Engine would be a Passion. Tesla called it a 'powerhouse in a hat.' One version developed 110 h.p. at 5000 RPM and was less than ten inches in diameter! Tesla believed larger turbines could achieve 1000 h.p. The disk-turbine rotary engine runs vibration-free. It is cheap to manufacture because nothing but the rotor bearings needs to be fitted to close tolerances. It requires little maintenance. If necessary, the rotor can be replaced with ease. The turbine can run on steam, compressed air, gasoline, or oil! (There is nothing more important in technology than versatility.) The Tesla turbine's only moving part is its rotor. Imagine, a powerful internal combustion engine with only one moving part.
Contact Tesla Engine Builders Association, 5464 W. Port Washington Rd., #293, Milwaukee, WI 53217 for more information...
How it works: Unlike conventional turbines that use blades or buckets to catch the flow, Tesla's uses a set of rigid metal disks that, instead of battling the propelling stream at steep angles, runs with smooth efficiency in parallel with the flow. What drives the disks is a peculiar adhesion that exists between the surface of a body and any moving fluid. This adhesion, a hindrance to aircraft and other vehicles, is, in Tesla's word's caused by `the shock of the fluid against the asperities of the solid substance` and from `internal forces opposing molecular separation` .
The propellent enters the intake and is nozzled onto the disks at their perimeter. It travels over the spinning disks in a spiral fashion, exiting at the disks' central openings and is exhausted from the casing... Tesla notes in his patent that, in an engine driven by a fluid, `changes in the velocity and direction of movement of the fluid should be as gradual as possible.` This, he observed, is not the case in existing engines where `sudden changes, shocks, and vibrations are unavoidable.`
`The use of pistons, paddles, vanes and blades,` notes Tesla, `necessarily introduces numerous defects and limitations, adds to the complication, cost of production, and maintenance of the machines.` We who are stuck with the piston engine know this ALL TOO WELL. The Tesla turbine is VIBRATION FREE because the propelling fluid moves `in natural paths or stream lines of least resistance, free from constraint and disturbance.` How does internal combustion work in a Tesla Turbine? The Tesla Turbine DIESELS to provide free energy! Think about it. If you ever had an engine that decided to keep going after you have turned off the ignition, that engine was giving you free energy from all those weird little hot spots combusting from dirty gas deposits. In direct contrast to today's piston engine where diesling completely throws off the timing, the Tesla Turbine thrives because dieseling is its natural state. The combustion turns the spark plug into a hot spot and this hot spot keeps the combustion going.
This doesn't mean you have to feed it dirty gas, although you could. I completely recommend a clean burning fuel - like hydrogen - yet much safer. Please check out AquafuelÂ® (trademark from Aqualux Corporation). A method was discovered where by a high voltage arc underneath water produces a clean burning gas even more powerful than gasoline.
"AquaLux produces the new patented gas, AquaFuelÂ®. AquaFuel is a non-fossil alternative fuel that is a clean synthetic gas with unusual properties. AquaFuel is the only known fuel that emits oxygen (O2) when it burns. AquaFuel is one of only three gases that are lighter than air. (Hydrogen and helium are the other two.) "
"AquaFuel is a nonfossil combustible gas discovered by Mr. Bill Richardson, which is produced by an electric discharge of carbon arcs within distilled, fresh, salt or other types of water, thus being essentially composed of Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon and their compounds". This technology has already been patented (US Patent #5,159,900 and US#5,417,817 and US#5,435,274). Anyone can use their imagination for the applications in consideration of these hidden technologies and network them: If we have a mini AquaFuelÂ® production plant feeding aquafuel into a Tesla Turbine Engine, the Tesla Engine would produce oxygen. If we decide to capture that oxygen, we can, in turn, feed it to an O2, H2 burning engine (perhaps, another Tesla Turbine) which would produce water. We can feed that water, in turn, to a Papineau Generator which produces H2 or back to a mini AquaFuel production plant. (Are the gears turning in your head yet?) Personally, I would keep it simple.
A detailed experiment for creating your own aquafuel is located at http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/aquagen.htm. There are more links to be found with a simple search of "aquafuel" on a the web.
When you look at the aquafuel generation experiment you could probably use your imagination as to how we can have clean, safe running, inexpensive transportation right now that could definitely benefit everyone in a depraved economy. Not to mention an electrical and heat generator for the home.
You might say, "Well, OK, I wouldn't mind having over unity energy generation, but I'm just an average guy who only knows how to buy what's offered on the market. How do I help to get advanced energy systems to people like me?" There are many variations on this theme of harnessing 'Free' energy. You can harass your local congress and senators about looking into these variations based on four groups:
1)-Quantum vacuum/zero point field energy access systems and related advances in electromagnetic theory and applications (e.g. Energy Transience, Back EMF)
2)-Electrogravitic and magnetogravitic energy and propulsion (e.g. B-2 Bomber, Levity Technology)
3)-Room temperature nuclear effects (e.g. cold fusion)
4)-Electrochemical and related advances to internal combustion systems that achieve near zero emissions and a very high efficiency. (e.g. fuel cells, Tesla Turbine Engine)
Do you feel left out, yet? We have all been left out from true advances in science. If the concept of 'Free' energy science is over your head, don't worry. Just accept it, the same way you accept the computer you are using to read this. We accept the technology that is given to us and use it. How many of us try to understand it? Few. But we ALL use it.
All I did was go those few extra steps because I had that question too: "If Free Energy is real, why aren't consumers using it?" Those few extra steps were long and difficult, but I am a firm believer in God's Word (as opposed to most engineers). "So I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours" (Mark 11:24).
God has delivered to me, time and again. What I wanted in my heart was always delivered to me - and I wanted the truth. The truth I discovered is very disturbing:
The oil cartels which are the oil producers, the pipelines, the refineries, the car manufacterers, the petroleum products producers, the central banking system, and many others have a vested interest in fossil fuel technology. Their production, money, and interests are 'locked' on oil - even with the knowledge that this planet will be drained of fossil fuel in ten to twenty years. (I still remember reading in my chemistry text in 1980 that there was only about 20 years left of fossil fuel. In reality, the world oil resources will top out in 2010.) They know about 'Free' energy. They have already bought some patents from their inventors to keep the devices off the market. They are most likely waiting until human civilization is completely drained before they decide to introduce THEIR 'Free' energy products. There upon, they will probably charge humanity an arm and a leg just to know about it.
These worldwide oil cartels have connections everywhere including the middle east and whatever type of groups that are necessary. They are allied with the Federal Reserve and have bought most politicians in power. The evidence is clear from a September 7, 2001 ABC News report, "A congressional watchdog agency is getting ready to decide whether it will take the Bush administration to court as the White House continues to defy demands for information about its secret energy policy meetings." Since the horrifying attack of September 11 there has been no new legal action against the Bush Administration. In reverence to the oil cartels, the world is being pushed into war - not for freedom - this time for geopolitical competition for natural resources, a precious plot of land in the middle east which would provide further life blood for the deadly oil cartels and their polluting technology. Violent geopolitical competition for natural resources in the name of "freedom" and a potential "enemy" is the beginning of the end for modern civilization.
Conspiracy theories hold water if the facts have a deep impact on human civilization rather than simply satisfy curiosity. Muldaur of the X-Files who "wants to believe" was nothing but a dog 'barking for the sake of barking.' In fact, Hollywood producers live in fear of 'government' reprisal if they try making any movies about 'Free' energy. (Yes, 'Free Energy' is capable of powering real weapons such as rail guns, but there is a way of stopping that.) Of course, they know about it. They do research. Haven't you ever wondered why sci-fi will do techno "babble," but will never go into any real, scientific detail? It's not just national security. Haven't you ever noticed that Hollywood and media will not share facts with the public on how to improve life on this planet? They have a big, dangerous boss who denies their first amendment rights at well defined times.
The fact is - there is nothing in the United States Constitution preventing any homeowner from having their own over unity energy generation device. The deregulation of energy allows ANYONE to sell electricity back into the grid. Unfortunately, certain power producers took advantage of this and over charged the centralized power companies. This does NOT mean that deregulation is a failure. Deregulation failed in the hands of the wrong people. Energy deregulation is meant to serve the average U.S. Citizen, but that has NOT happened yet. Most people have not been able to take advantage of energy deregulation. Most people do not know how because they have not been given the knowledge.
I will take only one example among the myriad of advanced energy sciences which is academically sequestered from public view.
For the science students who are interested, yet unaware of homopolar technology, the Homopolar Generator started with Michael Faraday's Disk Dynamo back in 1831. Since then it has developed through some famous people such as Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein, Bruce DePalma (Brian's Brother), and Adam Trombly. It has also been through the hands of many unfamed scientists. Thomas Valone is one of them; in fact he wrote an excellent book on the subject: "THE HOMOPOLAR HANDBOOK - A Definitive Guide to Faraday Disk and N-Machine Technologies" which he wrote as part of his university thesis (ISBN 0-9641070-1-5).
To quote a passage from the description of the earth as a homopolar generator (The Homopolar Generator - Tesla's Contribution, pp.78): "If the spinning fluids of the earth's outer core act like the disk in the dynamo, the earth could simularly produce a large magnetic field, provided there was a small magnetic field around at the beginning. (The small field that pervades the galaxy would be a good candidate according to some scientists.) Another provision would be the core fluids keep moving, and the unanswered question here is what 'energy source' is responsible for doing just that..." The answer lies in zero point energy.
Every iota in every atom in every particle of the universe vibrates at its own frequency even at its lowest entropy where zero point energy is derived. With enough impetus the quantum magnetic flux created within a homopolar generator derives and transforms zero point energy into useful energy. Interestingly enough, Mr. Valone also includes material from "SUNBURST, Return of the Ancients" by Norman Paulsen; it's an encounter of the third kind. The homopolar generator presented here is used for propulsion in Levity Lechnology better know as "UFOs" for the fanatics who want to believe anything but the science involved. I will soon try to elucidate the science of deriving zero point energy for the layman.
In a quote from the chapter, "Encounter at Emerson Dry Lake," our 'alien' friend explains how that 'energy source' works in a homopolar generator: "To create a vortex which would operate in this physical dimension,.. we must spin a physical object which is, or can be, magnetized. Spinning a magnetized object, we would create a vortex which would induce the energy in space to move towards its center. As the energy particles in space are drawn into the vortex by magnetic attraction, they would take orbital positions around the center of the magnetic core. The accumulation of energy particles around the spinning magnetic center would generate a high density magnetic field. With this condition we can create two poles, one at the center of the magnetic core, and one on the perimeter of the magnetic field. Here we can perpetually draw off energy in the form of positive and negative electrical currents. This is the principle on which our propulsion units operate.
"Any type of physical material which has been magnetized will generate electrical current if the object is rotated. The rotation of permanent magnets will, therefore, generate electrical current. The higher the velocity of rotation, the greater the flow of energy..." This is the basic premise of a homopolar generator.
Those 'energy particles' in space they speak of are freely available. They are able to transform from one form of energy to the next on demand. In the case of a homopolar generator, they transform into magnetic energy. Any kind of electromagnetic energy is emitted from an atom when an electron skips from a higher to lower levels in quantum vacuum. Keep in mind that electrons remain in constant movement as an elliptical precession wave. These precession waves vibrate in resonance with their surroundings to perpetuate this quantum level, so they obey the laws of quantum electrodynamics. George Bugh said it best in his, Spin Wave Technology Initial Release, "electromagnetic interactions of atomic particles involving the propagation of changing spin axis orientations can be utilized for power generation, propulsion, signal processing and communications..." We are familiar with these electromagnetic applications. The quantum vaccuum is not absorbing the same energy which it radiates. We must also consider the energy that goes into creating matter.
Each culture on this planet refers to these etheric 'energy packets' in different ways such as 'vril,' 'prana,' 'aether,' 'tai chi.' Scientists who have studied it call it 'orgone,' 'primordial energy' and 'KRW (kreiselwelle) waves.' Strangely enough, primordial 'energy particles' move like the 'tai chi' symbol, almost a spermatozoan motion in a three dimensions as a much slower precession wave. Primordial energy exists as low frequency long waves that obey different laws than electromagnetic waves; when they are transmuted and transformed through the quantum vaccum they become the useable EM waves with which we are familiar. Etheric energy IS at zero point energy and is most readily available throughout the universe. We need a more complete treatment of 'space' in order to truly understand its constituents.
A theory to cover force fields of all types should attribute a fundamental cause to interaction of matter at a distance whether the interaction be gravitational, magnetic, nucleonic, or electrostatic. Present theories include interchange of virtual photons or mesons and multidimensional distortion of the space-time continuum. The argument will, basically, depend on the concept of a medium to support the wave motion, flux, or distortion. The medium is space and the properties of it have never been seriously presented, neither practically nor theoretically, in the academic realm. The serious investigation of space falls outside the realm of classical physics and academia.
The accepted idea is that space is empty, a place with the absence of matter, devoid of tangibility. This is taught to our children as being a primary contention. This is wrong and negative thinking. We do not understand it, so we turn our backs on it.
Physical investigation of 'space' is impossible since the experimental technique demands use of apparatus which is made of matter which, in turn, occupies space. In fact, even EM waves must be able to propogate through 'something' just as a sound wave.
One of the fundamentals of the experimental method is that the materials and principles under investigation cannot be included in the apparatus. This was but one failure of the Michelson-Morley experiment. In its original form, this experiment was set up to test for 'aether' drag due to the passage of the earth through the medium; this was ASSUMED to have been an experiment to actually test for the existence of an ether. Failure of the experiment to give a positive result made it possible to interpret the negative result as favoring the nonexistence of the ether as Sir Oliver Lodge imagined it.
The then-developing materialist philosophies took the opportunity to discredit the pseudo-scientific religious cult of spiritualism, which advocated an 'etheric existence,' an important part of the philosophy. As it happened the two 'etherics' need not have any connection except in the choice of words. The ether theory was dropped and the spiritualist cult subdued.
Today, the Michelson-Morely experiment has been modified to show Doppler interference between coherent wave trains. One wave travels against the apparatus and the other with the direction of rotation of the apparatus. Results are in favor of the theory of relativity, but can also be interpreted in favor of 'aether drag' within the stationary medium about the apparatus.
The Michaelson-Morley Experiment was used to disprove the existence of universal energy, academically and classically. They succeeded, but their experiment also went under the assumption that the 'aether' is static, existing for no apparent reason. In reality the 'aether' is quite dynamic with movement and behavior that can be mathematically predicted.
A vacuum transmits radiation and force fields, so to refer to it as being empty is inaccurate. Real emptiness must include in its definition reference to its INABILITY to propagate energy. Such may be better termed 'hyperspace.' As to whether hyperspace has the dimensions of space and time or not is a topic for more thought. It is easier to attribute the dimensions to the space fabric in hyperspace, the aether.
The idea of an energy continuum throughout space occurred to Dirac. On the basis of his theory, matter particles emerge from a ground state and become physically OBSERVABLE. Material above the ground state has a higher energy than the ground state and so requires energy to be dislodged. The energy corresponds to the total energy of the particle, its mass energy (mc^2) and other potential or kinetic energies. The theory, then, supposes that matter is of the substance of the ground state, that is, 'empty space.' In comparison, the Lodge theory supposes that the aether has a maximum of energy; matter particles are a LOWER ENERGY PRECIPITATE from the ETHER. The same idea, but a difference of sign. However, this implies that the appearance of matter is a preferred state, and that the creative process is a naturally occurring condition.
Heisenberg, in formulating the 'Unified Field Theory,' assumed a SPACE FABRIC of some nature. To quote from the Lindau Conference, June 28th, 1962, "The discovery shows that the different elementary particles are not Nature's building bricks, completely independent of each other, but many different forms of a fumdamental substance manifest as energy." From then on, the 'fundamental substance' is forgotten from the history books. "The multiplicity of these forms corresponds to the multiplicity of the mathematical Symmetries of the basic equation."
Sir Oliver Lodge imagined the space fabric as having a microcellular structure, each cell being a vortex (quantum vacuum precession wave) whose size was of the order of the size of the fundamental particles, or even smaller. The medium was frictionless and the rotational velocity of the vortices related to the velocity of light. The intrinsic energy of the ether was in the motion of the vortices (related to the wave of probability as a statistical average of each element in the periodic table). This attributed an ultimate energy source to space itself. Lodge also imagined that the ether had an enormous inertia and density. The inertia in mass was due to the ether in it and solidarity of matter was virtual.
A simular idea occurred to Karl Schappeller of Castle Aurolzmunster in Inviertel, Austria (died 1947). According to his philosophy, a change in the space fabric (static potential) gave rise to so-called primary magnetism which may be interpreted as a type of 'autogravitation.' This primary magnetism caused a gathering of the surrounding space fabric and from it issued more fundamental energy as an intensification of the primary magnetism. (Reverse energy potential is characteristic of ether). At a certain stage, the system reached an equilibrium gathering space fabric, and from it precipitated energy. When the energy density reached a required level, matter would be produced (simular to the formation of snow and rain). The system would take up a spherical form in the 'natural' state and become what Schappeller called 'glowing magnetism.'
Glowing magnetism, he claimed, constituted the core of all planets and suns, the gravitational core of which was due to the glowing magnetism at its core (the constant movement of molten magma). How this theory fits the universal law of gravitation is at first difficult to see. We must remember that the universal law of gravitation is based on Kepler's Laws, which were derived from astronomical observations of the planets. The masses of these bodies can only be determined from their gravitational interaction, not from their inertial properties. Hence for cosmic bodies the term 'm' in the derived formula: E(gravitational field) = G(m/d^2) is not necessarily related to the inertial mass of these bodies, but the 'GRAVITY' of them.
Gravity CANNOT be proved to be due to the mass content of these bodies by astronomical observation only. Further, no convincing experiments have been conducted to prove that static inert matter has any gravitational field. (I still remember the experiment in school where two bowling ball sized, spherical, metallic objects were supported from two gliding rides at a central, stationary rod. A self contained, gravitational field was attributed to each of these objects, therefore, they would glide closer together by "at least a millimeter a day." Of course, this premise excludes the possibility of the earth influencing the gravitional interaction between different bodies on its surface.)
Experiments, like that of Airies, which use the earth as a mass, are questionable on the basis that the gravity may be due to the earth's field alone. Boys' and Cavendish's experiments showed only that masses in relative motion have a force between them, since in both experiments the masses were in torsional vibration suspended by a beam. The force could be attributed to an inductive or relativistic effect between the charged particles constituting the masses.
Hoyle, from his work on quasars, has deduced that vast cosmic masses could undergo gravitational collapse leading to a singularity and that the converse was possible. A singularity could explode into a 'creation field.' This is much the same idea as that of Schappeller, though on the basis of his theory the creation process is much less dramatic. Hoyle's creation field arises from nothing, whereas that of Schappeller, Glowing Magnetism, arises from the space fabric. Which is the more plausible?
Physical evidence for the existence of glowing magnetism may be available. The source of energy in comets has long been a problem. How a comet can GIVE OFF SO MUCH RADIANT ENERGY and continually dissipate its matter in the tail, yet despite its apparent lack of substance SURVIVE TO RETURN AFTER MANY YEARS, is difficult to explain terms of conventional science. The usual explanation is, of course, the energy is "re-radiated" sun's energy. Who has proved it? Ask any astrophysicist: "Hypothetically, if this is only re-radiated energy from the sun, what could last thousands of years through countless light years of space to do that?"
The existence of 'ball lightening' has now been accepted but as yet eluded explanation, except that attempts have been made without the usual mathematical substantiation. The peculiar anti-gravitational effect, the inductive efrects, and the fantastic energy of ball lightning fits neatly in with Schappeller's theory of Glowing Magnetism. The glowing ball of polarized space fabric is precipitated by enormous static fields or high current pulses in thunder storms.
At the center of a glowing magnetism, the space fabric is modified and the energy condensate comes off as magnetic fields and radiation. The consumed fabric is replaced by an influx of the surrounding space. Matter particles in the surrounding space would experience a force towards the center. This would be a gravitational field. Lodge imagined that the ether would be near incompressible with a very high elasticity. A small inhomogeneity would give rise to a relatively big effect. Also the ether flux would be at the velocity of light and bunched in much the same way as magnetic fields bunch at high intensity. Thus, the maximum velocity of a matter particle would be that of the velocity of light and the approach to that velocity, an exponential. Can this theory explain cosmic gravitation? If so, there must always be a magnetic effect associated with it.
The name 'glowing magnetism' implies that Schappeller considered this to be of prime importance. In fact, he maintained that the magnetic field produced by a glowing core was different from the familiar type of field in that it was a DYNAMIC FIELD, NOT STATIC. This is consistent for an energy source with INDEFINITE ENERGY could produce a continually expanding flux. Such a dynamic flux would be capable of inducing a D.C. in conductors. As a secondary effect, the currents would produce a static magnetic field of the usual type. A cord of a cosmic body then would produce dynomagnetism which would be absorbed by matter to produce a magnetic field. This field would have to be a function of the gravity if the theory is any good.
As it happens a reference to a related work can be found. Prof. P.M.S. Brackett (yes, those are his initials), quoting from the works of Schuster, Sutherland and H.A. Wilson, showed that the magnetic moment 'P' and angular momentum 'U' of the earth and sun are related by the equation:
P = ((BxG^.5)/c)U where P=1
'c' is the velocity of light and 'G' the universal gravitation constant. The relationship holds for Bohr magnetrons and support for it appears in DeBroglie's equations for mass waves. It is interesting to note that the formula also includes rotational motion. Particularly, the equation relates angular momentum, magnetic field ('B') and gravity.
Angular momentum is known to be related to gyroscopic restoring couples. Although gyroscopic action can be dealt with mathematically, NO PHYSICAL explanation exists for it. In view of the fact that a vector is required along the axis of rotation, might this not suggest that rotating matter generates a field along this axis? As yet, it can only be postulated that the field couples the gyro in a fixed orientation in the space fabric. This direction sensitivity suggests ISOTROPIC qualities of the space fabric. Lodge imagined that this might be so.
Magnetism at one time was regarded as separate from electricity until the electromagnetic effect was discovered. Then the problem was: 'Is electricity a form of Magnetism or is magnetism a form of electricity?' Einstein showed, however, that magnetism was a relativistic effect due to the movement of charge, thereby identifying MAGNETISM AS BEING A FORM OF ELECTRICITY. From thence sprung the concept of electron spin which fit a good theory to explain permanent magnetism. Much work is being done on spin resonance which further supports the theory (such as the postulations by George Bugh on the precession wave of electrons which perpetuates the quantum vacuum vortex). However, the discovery of magnetic monopoles indicates the possible existence of magnetism without charge and that magnetic lines of force need not be continuous. (Look up the SQUID Research back in the early 1980's at Stanford University.) This raises questions as to the exactness of the Theory of Relativity and Electromagnetic theory in their present form.
Schappeller regarded magnetism as more fundamental than electric current, and that current was flowing magnetism in the conductor. The field of influence surrounding a wire was an externalization of the flux within the wire. The field, therefore, must be regarded as flowing parallel to the 'current' in the conductor. The mathematical treatment of such a configuration leads to the same practical results as the conventional idea of magnetic flux as being perpendicular to the current flow.
The actual nature of current and magnetism, being one and the same, may be visualized as large scale flux interspaced between the 'Lodge' microvorticies. Such a flux must result from the breakup of the microvorticies and therefore will appear as a form of energy potential. CONVENTIONAL MAGNETIC FIELDS MAY BE REGARDED AS A FORM OF POTENTIAL ENERGY.
If we accept that magnetism is MORE fundamental, then a consistent explanation must be found for static potential, induced electromagnetic field (E.M.F.,) and electrochemical potential. A conductor forced through a magnetic field interacts with the macroflux of the ether ahead of it and absorbs the flux in a direction depending on the direction of the macroflux. This constitutes the current in the conductor. The flowing magnetism in the conductor reconstitutes the macroflux behind it, the energy being derived from that which forces the conductor. If the conductor is an open circuit, an E.M.F. is set up. This is like electrostatic potential, in that it is static magnetism, the polarity depending on an excess of ether at the point at higher potential compared with that at lower potential. Since the ether tends towards uniformity, an ether flow will occur under suitable conditions to relieve the strain. This constitutes FLOWING MAGNETISM which is current. The flow in the conductor affects the surrounding ether, giving up some energy to it, creating macrovortices, which is a MAGNETIC FIELD.
An electrochemical E.M.F. is an expression of the energy available from an exothermic reaction, but in a potential form. When current flows, the reaction takes place and the potential chemical energy is dissipated. Schappeller regarded chemical bonds as a static form of magnetism in the same way that static electricity could be regarded as immobile magnetism. Matter particles being an aether precipitate cause permanent density irregularities in the ether. Chemical bonding or particle bonding lowers the stressed condition of the ether releasing the retained aether, or static magnetism as some form of aether disturbance. This could be aether waves (radiation), macrovortices (magnetic field) or flowing magnetism (current), which are all forms of energy.
Looking back over the theory, it is seen that in glowing magnetism the space fabric is destroyed as microvorticies and the resultant residual flux appears as large scale flow patterns in magnetic fields or macrovortices. If this primary magnetism reaches high values, the flux interferes with the surrounding space fabric to produce matter particles, so being partially reabsorbed. Radiation can only be produced by matter particles, so that once matter has formed, energy may leave the creation field as radiation from the particles which are stimulated by the magnetism.
The primary magnetic field of the Schappeller glowing core is different in a very fundamental way from the usual type of field. In a perfect conductor, if the E.M.F. is maintained, the current increases and hence the magnetic field. That is, as long as energy is supplied to the system the field expands. In a resistance, the energy is dissipated as heat and the field is constant. In the Schappeller primary field, the flux is continually supplied as the energy is created, and therefore the field continually expands: This is dynomagnetism. An ordinary magnetometer is insensitive to the field. A conductor in the field will have an induced current and thereby produce a detectable static field. The instrument to detect a dynomagnetic field must consist of a loop conductor with a magnetometer at its center.
If, as Schappeller states, the earth has glowing magnetism as its core, then it should produce dynomagnetism. Most of this would be absorbed in the material of the Planet and produce the static field. If any of the dynomagnetic field did penetrate the surface, it would be difficult to detect against the background of atmospheric disturbance and static field. In his early experiments, (Wilhelm) Riech did detect and accumulate energy from the earth which was other than natural radiation. A core of glowing magnetism would be and would have been in the process of PRODUCING MATTER. The earth would have been EXPANDING from the center since it first formed. This is the best explanation for 'continental drift,' but a reason for the expanding earth could not be found. Geographers would welcome this idea, for the land masses have been shown to fit neatly together on a sphere of about half the size of the earth.
(As far as creationist theories go this is the untold story. Creation didn't happen in any special place; it's all around us, all the time.)
The creation fields or glowing magnetic cores at the center of cosmic bodies must somehow originate. Schappeller's argument as to the origin is more difficult to follow, because of terminology, than the rest of the theory. It seems, however, that when a sun becomes large enough to form a crust, the very process of doing so causes a focusing of the various fields which starts up a new flowing core making the center of the new sun. The old sun has its supply of ether cut down and the glowing core is subdued but not snuffed out. It becomes a planet of the new sun with an apparent reduce mass due to the drop of gravity and reduced size as it initially cools and contracts. The core of the planet is not yet finished, for it continues until the crust becomes very thick and finally cuts off the ether supply. Then the core does die and the planet loses its gravity. Only molecular forces remain to hold the planet material together and if the internal pressure is high the planet can explode.
This clashed with the conventional ideas, but thought out in detail equally explains observation. It does go one better in that it adequately explains some facts not covered by the conventional theory, the asteroids, for example.
Other than providing a fundamental explanation for the organized universe, Schappeller went as far as to design a device using and converting the fundamental substance into USEFUL ENERGY. It was designed to produce a glowing magnetic core in a vacuum which then is self-sustaining. Basically it consists of a pair of coils wound on to a hollow ceramic form, shaped spherically and contained in an iron sphere. The coils are of copper tubing packed with a permanent electret material. This constitutes the dynomagnetic generator. To convert the energy into mechanical energy, a rotor is used, also made from copper tube packed with electret. The sphere functions only after the electret material is polarized.
The terminology in the Schappeller theory is naturally difficult to follow, that is, apart from the strangeness of the concepts. After several readings, one might conclude that 'glowing magnetism', or 'aether precipitation,' starts if the electric and/or the magnetic fields reach enormous values at a given point. It seems that this is the function of the stator device outlined above. The arrangement of the fields must be such that a reduction in the density of the ether occurs instantaneously. An immediate influx of ether occurs which continued under its own inertia. The RESULTANT COMPRESSION then causes the PRODUCTION OF ENERGY which appears as radiation and magnetism. By this process it would seem that an oscillatory state (harmonic resonance) is set up with the frequency related to the size of the glowing core. One might expect some sort of longitudinal ether wave to be set up which would be entirely different to the transverse waves of electromagnetic radiation. The wave would cause variations in the ether density which would mean that matter would tend to occupy regions of maximum density in the wave and that the velocity of light would vary slightly between maxima and minima.
In the case of the earth, the Van Allen belts could be taken as an indication of such gravity waves, and for the sun, the obvious fact that the planets occupy orbits that are harmonically related. In both cases a standing wave is indicated. It might be worthwhile research to look for variations in the velocity of light in the Van Allen belts.
Lodge deals with the problem of inertia by attributing the property to the ether itself. Matter, he claims, has no inertia as such, but acquires an 'induction as' it moves though the space fabric, or more correctly, the space fabric moves through it (attributed to the space fabric being more dynamic than matter, a logical assumption because the resulting mass would have a different inertia than its etheric counterpart). The induction constitutes a change of energy seen as kinetic energy, and the state of motion lasts as long as the induction lasts. The theory also asserts that the ether itself has an enormous inertia and is in a preferred state of rest. Small movements give rise to big effects, for example as in gravitational fields. However, small movement does not mean slow movement. The idea that the cellular vortices circulate at the speed of light (precession of the quantum vaccuum wave) might be extended to larger fluxes in terms of glowing magnetism. The technology behind this universal phenomenon has been known, yet stricken from academia, therefore, the minds of the people it would free.
For now, I ask you to reconsider every bit of scientific 'education' that's been handed to you on a silver spoon. You can go to any science instructor right now and ask them if they are allowed to present any type of treatise on 'Glowing Magnetism.' You can go to any scientist at Stanford University, SRI, or anywhere else and ask them if they believe the general population is completely updated about available energy technology. You can go to any newspaper and ask the reporter if he even knows what Glowing Magnetism is.
I can promise you that you will find out the same way I did, the hard way, that any scientific premise of 'universal energy' has been stricken from the history books and the eyes and minds of the people for a reason: FREEDOM. 'Free Energy' creates FREEDOM for the people.
When I put 'Free' in quotes - I mean 'Free' like air. The air we breathe is 'Free' so should be the energy we are using. Of course, in order to have truly free air, our current state of industry must be compromised. Is that too much too ask? How do I feel when I have to use a filthy internal combustion engine with expensive, dirty, polluting, cancerous, MTBE-ridden fossil fuel? I feel like a caveman, who built a fire to keep the wild animals away... No, less than a caveman. The thing is - I know I'm not a caveman. I know better.
I assert to you, the layman, right now, that You Don't Know what Real Freedom Is. Most people cannot fathom it. Most people think it means freedom from responsibility. That is the far-fetched concept of a small, discursive mind. REAL FREEDOM is the blessed ability to go forward in your life with Love, Education, Finance, and Real Work towards the Space Age. That's Real Freedom. Real Freedom is Constructive Behavior and Constructive Outlets that go towards the Advancement of Humanity. Real Freedom is knowing the difference between Good and Evil, then choosing the Good. Real Freedom exists in a Spiritually Advanced People, a people who are willing to fight for their freedom, a people who know that Real Freedom Starts with God, His Word -and His Science. People with God are a Free People. (Look back at the adventurers who settled and fought to keep the United States of America, if you don't believe any such people ever existed - then look at who we have now.)
Begin with Your Freedom. Send an e-mail to email@example.com to discover how we can ALL leave the caveman era with a 'Free' Energy Generator. At http://energy.resourcez.com you will discover how to assemble your own super energy efficient science fair project using simple parts from a hardware store.
For those of you who still believe I am a crackpot talking from a hole in the wall, these are the facts: A number of practical applications using over unity energy technology have been developed over the past several decades, but such breakthroughs have been either ignored due to their unconventional nature or have been classified and suppressed due to national security, military interests and "special" interests.
The greatest danger is ignorance by our leaders of these scientific breakthroughs and ignorance of how to manage their disclosure. The advanced countries of this world must be prepared to put systems in place to assure the exclusive peaceful use of such energy and propulsion advances. Economic and industrial interests should be prepared so that those aspects of our economy that will be adversely affected (commodities, oil, gas, coal, public utilities, engine manufacturing, etc.) can be cushioned from sudden reversals and be economically "hedged" by investing in and supporting the new energy infrastructure.
A creative view of the future, not fear and suppression of such technologies, is required. 'Free' Energy is needed IMMEDIATELY. If we wait 1O to 20 more years, it will be too late to make the needed changes before world oil shortages, exorbitant costs and geopolitical competition for resources causes a melt-down in the world's economy and political structure. The oil cartels and the world banking system are waiting for this to happen: If humanity is plunged into utter chaos, they have the power and the resources to take over.
The question is not to debate the reality of 'Free' Energy. Over Unity Energy Generation exists and IS a viable replacement for fossil fuels. The question is whether we have the courage to allow such a transformation in world society to occur...
I encourage the residents of these states to ask their attorney generals why they would deny technology that would eliminate pollution, clean this world for ourselves and our children, help restore 100's of 1000's of jobs that were lost, especially in the computer industry that would provide the controllers, regulators, and measurement devices for this technology, and buffer the economy worldwide.
The most organized, honest effort for getting advanced energy technology to the people to help save the world is being done by an organization of scientists led by Dr. Steven Greer. Please visit his websites at http://www.disclosure project.org and http://www.seaspower.com for more information.