PRWeb The Leader Press Release Distribution
See How PRWeb Works

We're here to help 1-866-640-6397

Login Create Free Account


All Press Releases for July 5, 2004 Subscribe to this News Feed    
 

InterCourts® Announces: U.S. Representatives Indicted In PoliticalCourt For Sedition

The People v these United States Representatives, individually, POLITICAL COURT (2004:7-6) alleged as follows a violation of a Seditionist act.

(PRWEB) July 5, 2004 -- For violation of Internet Court code: P-0-4(f), Sedition: Incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.:

The plaintiff has fulfilled the requirements for filing of charge allegations in the Court and the Clerk has determined the complaints to be properly filed and valid in this matter.

It is therefore ordered that the defendants shall face the Jury on the charge or charges as alleged, individually.

The following argument is before the Court:

Date of Infraction:
July 1, 2004

Infraction Type:
Sedition

Defendants Indicted Individually: U.S. Rep.'s Eddie Bernice Johnson, Jerrold Nadler, Edolphus Towns, Joseph Crowley and Carolyn B. Maloney, of New York, Raul Grijalva of Arizona, Corrine Brown of Florida, Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland, Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Michael M. Honda of California, and Julia Carson of Indiana.

Description:
The United Nations, not as stupid as one might think, correctly responded with "We don't intervene in such affairs unless there is a proper request". A request for the UN to oversee the Presidential 'election' in this country was placed by letter to the UN from a group of absolutely disgusting politicians. The identities of the politicians wanting to subject the soverign process of the States determining the election of a President in this country (the people do NOT elect the President in this country and never have) to international oversight, has been found. http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/special_packages/election2004/9069426.htm . These individuals are signatories on the most insane request by an elected official of this nation ever made.

Specifics:
These individuals, by their act have sought to place control of a constitutional process of this nation under the direction and control of a foreign oversight, which is "an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government" ie: insurrection. The request made to the U.N. was for "The Democrats had asked in the letter for "international election monitors" to watch for "questionable practices and voter disenfranchisement on Election Day."" These insurrectionists, enemies of the people of this country, have attempted to allow a foreign entity into the constitutional function of this nation as oversight for pure and simple political purposes intended to cause additional insurrection and interfere with the operations and functions of this Government and its Constitution which is "incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority ", ie: SEDITION.

Argument:
""We are deeply concerned that the right of U.S. citizens to vote in free and fair elections is again in jeopardy," the letter to Annan said." Let us get something right: NOT ONE recount of any election result from Florida amounted to an election of Al Gore. NOT ONE. The Democrats started the process of disenfranchisement in Florida and have twisted and spun the facts ever since in a total LIE to the American People. Now, these idiotic, seditionists Democrats have stepped over the line of decency in politics and have invited the WORLD into this nation to FURTHER THEIR OWN POLITICAL INTENTS. This cannot be tolerated. We call upon the people of the States these seditionists represent to impeach them from office and put them in jail. This nation is at war. Now, politicians find it within themselves to cause sedition and insurrection in direct comfort of the enemy. If they are not held accountable for this, it will get worse and worse until the day will come, not too far in the f uture that any form of overthrowing this government will be permitted. The attempted COUP of 2000 by the Democrats in Florida was stopped by law. If we permit it to be acceptable by default this country is forever lost. These individuals are being charged individually for their Anti-American seditionist and insurrectionist acts.

It is the order of this Court that the Defendants shall be publicly announced as having been INDICTED of the charge as alleged and shall be listed in the Court Defense Docket individually for their act, where the Defendant(s) may offer a defense before the Jury and that upon such defense, rendered within forty-eight (48) hours of this Indictment the Clerk shall place the Complaint before the Jury for Verdict; and in the absence of such Defendant Response, the Clerk shall permit defense from interested parties and upon receipt of such defense shall place the Complaint before the Jury for Verdict.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Filed By The Clerk
PoliticalCourt
Internet Court System®

About The Internet Court System
and PoliticalCourt
http://www.intercourts.com

PoliticalCourt is the people's voice in political accountability and offers the public (registered voters and not) the opportunity to hold Politicians accountable for what they say and do.

Some Politicians Say Anything To Get Elected. Hold Them Accountable In Political Court: Where The People Judge.

You can fool some of the people, some of the time; all of the people some of the time; but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.

Political Court is where the people hold Politicians accountable. Jury members may submit statements, policies, speeches and interviews by Politicians for judgment by the Jury.

PoliticalCourt is the people's opinion on Politicial Rhetoric.

Politician statements, opinions, claims, promises and speeches will be processed, as well as Political party, supporting organizations (527), lobbyists and PAC's' platforms and advertisements. Convicted Politicians will be announced in press releases and on this site. http://www.intercourts.com through the PoliticalCourt entrance.

Since the People are protected in the Constitution, this Complaint (alleging bias by a political rhetoric ) does not pretend to restrict the rights of free speech. It does pretend to argue the method, manner, conclusion and/or misuse of that right.
###

OPTIONS
Printer Friendly Version
Email this story to a colleague
CONTACT INFORMATION
Lee Hempfling
INTERCOURTS
480-332-1535
Email us Here
ATTACHED FILES

There are no multimedia files attached to this release. If this is your release, you may add images or other multimedia files through your PRWeb News Management Console.

ABOUT PRESS RELEASES
If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release. Please do not contact PRWeb. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry. PRWeb disclaims any content contained in these release. Our complete disclaimer appears here.