New Book In Town

Another book exposes U.S. judiciary.

(PRWEB) June 12, 2005 -- After the successful books of Judge Andrew P. Napolitano Constitutional Chaos" and Man in Black," how the supreme court is destroying America, by Mark R. Levine, here comes another book attacking the judiciary in the US, which will be in stores at the end of October 2005, and is already available for advanced ordering on the Internet ($18.50 in soft cover).

The book The Fixer": Why the US Judiciary is the Best Corrupt Judiciary in the World," written by Teddy Moore. Moore is the author of Victimization by Justice" (ISBN 1-4107-5607-6) and the screenplay Black Wall of Silence" the screenplay may be seen for free at www.injustice.ws and he makes a living as strategy litigation consultant at www.DoItProSe.com.and here are some pages from the book,for those interested:

Preamble:
Judge Andrew Neapolitan in his book Constitutional chaos" tries to tell us everything, about some injustices conducted by the government, he tells us a lot about every injustice so at the end of his book we know everything about nothing, he puts a tree here and a tree there but he will not tell you the story of the forest, and why it has grown wild another writer who tried to describe the wild forest of the judiciary in USA is Mark A Levin he tells you that Judges are not God, but he will not tell you what they are. He plays around the bushes whether we can trust the court, and reviews many decisions by the US Supreme court and he tells you that he do not like some of them, so what? They will not tell you that under the current system, justice is the exception not the rule, and that the judiciary is responsible for the wild injustice in USA.

If you ask attorneys in USA about the judiciary they will tell you that the system is not perfect" which is a great compliment to a broken system, as you will see later, this is the only criticism they are allowed to make about this great system.

I will show you in this book how the system really works and why it cannot make a right decision and why justice in the system is so rare.

I will show you that the legal system in the US is operated by two parties, one who is a fixer-attorney and the other is an extortable-attorney appearing before a presiding Judge who makes the wrong decisions, which are approved by the court of appeals, all the time. Why the system works in this way, is all that I will tell you in this book. You will not find in this book any endorsement from the legal system or the judiciary because this book tells the truth, about the corrupt Judiciary, which is the best, corrupts judiciary in the world. I will tell you why the government, congress or the constitution does not control the judiciary, and why the media do not tell you about it, and I will also tell you whether there is a way to reform the system without physically killing or threatening judges or engaging in a bloody revolution in order to overhaul the system.

THE Extortable Attorney:
The extortable attorney is a unique creation of the US legal system. An attorney is a very important part in the process of providing justice in the western world, because he is trained and supposed to know the law and supposed to present it properly to the judiciary, which is a pre-condition for justice.

In the US the judiciary, admits attorneys to practice law, and discipline attorneys, which created a situation in US where attorneys are afraid of the judiciary, and are therefore, in a conflict of interest with their clients. When an attorney can not present to a judge, without fear, his clients case, you can bet that this is a system that can not provide justice, because the judiciary do not know the facts and sometimes the law of the case, and some say do not want to know the law and the facts. So whats going on here?

Well, in England attorneys are independent of the judiciary, judges cannot discipline them, they are not admitted to practice law by the judiciary, (which is the main cause of the corruption of the judiciary) they are admitted by attorneys and disciplined by attorney, and so have the respect of the judiciary and their clients. In USA an attorney may be disbarred and bankrupt by any judge within ten minutes, when the allegations against the attorney are brought by the judge as prosecutor judge jury and executioner. The most popular acts against attorneys by the judiciary is a charge by the Judge that the attorney raises frivolous allegations or behaves in a frivolous manner, which allows a judge to impose severe penalties for each and every such allegation, which may cause ultimately the bankruptcy of the attorney. (Go tell them about first amendment rights of free speech) Another act by the judiciary against an attorney may be a simple declaration on record that the judge does not want to see anymore this attorney in his courtroom,(no detailed reason why is necessary) if this is drafted as an order of the court the appellate division will disbar the attorney from practicing law by Reciprocal discipline" and no appeal will be successful, to save the attorney from this unconstitutional execution. An attorney should have a right to raise any claim and a judge has a right to deny or dismiss the case, but in the USA the attorney is not independent and he stands in trial with his client literally like an unindicted co-conspirator, and he has far less rights to defend himself than any criminal accused in court.
This bizarre situation causes attorneys to neglect and even when necessary abandon their duty in favor of mere survival, against the interest of their client.

In most cases a client might be better off representing himself, without fear of being disbarred, and might save a lot of money for an inherent bad representation.

When attorneys are so weak, and the judiciary is so powerful, the consequences are a judiciary that takes advantage of its power to make a buck of it. The judiciary gets its money from the Attorney fixer" who was and is their lifeline. He helped them to get their job in the first place and he continue to lubricate the squeaky wheels of justice with money.

The Attorney Fixer:
When the facts and the law do not matter, naturally, something else has to decide the faith of a case. This is the attorney fixer.
The attorney fixer is connected to a specific judge, they are good buddies, and this attorney helped the judge to get the job in the first place. The fixer paid for the election campaign, and lubricated the judge with Financial support" like a sugar daddy. A fixer for one judge may be an extoretable for another judge. The legal system is organized like thugs connected to their corrupt leader. Every Judge has its sworn fixers, that win all the time, and the extortables lose all the time. They tell you that those extortables, who lose all the time, do not prepare properly their case, do not raise the right arguments etc. The fixer and the extoretable are sometimes good buddies, studied in the same law school, know perfectly to prepare the same futile papers now yet one wins all the time and the other has not the Facts", he never has the facts. Is this an act of God or money? The status of the attorney fixer can flourish because the appellate courts do no overturn any injustice made by the lower court and so the fixer knows that money paid to the judge is money well spent, because it will be final law, and the judge has nothing to fear, nobody supervise him, and he is immune from prosecution, and if prosecuted he will appear before his colleagues that will give him a break after all they know whats going on in the system.

The Presiding Judge:
The presiding Judge pressure the extortable to settle the case, as the attorney fixer advised him to do. The extortable complies with the Recommendation of the bench" The extoretable loses another case; the fixer wins another case, the judge get his remunerations. Since the case was settled there will be no appeal, the judge will be considered an effective judge, he cannot be blamed for the injustice, after all he just approved what the parties agreed to. The only problem, which this judge has, is when two fixers appear before him, or two extortables. When two fixers appear before the judge in the same case he is torn apart like he may deny relief to one of his children, and generally will help to settle the case amicably, and the losing party is promised the next case in line. When two extortables appear before the judge he tries to recruit a new fixer to his inner circle, and approves the settlement in his favor. If the extortable is not a fixer material.

Contact:
Gil Levy
7183583438
tm738@yahoo.com

###