Busi-Bee.com Website Quality of Service Report for Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Yahoo provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 99.826%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 94.164%.

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) September 29, 2006 -- For this report made on Thursday, September 28th, 2006, Busi-Bee.com took 18377 samples from the websites of Yahoo, Amazon.com, Best Buy, LookSmart, Akamai, and Lucent during the entire day of Wednesday, September 27th, 2006, and analyzed the data to compile the following results in order of best QoS to worse, precluded by an overall summary as follows;

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that Yahoo provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 99.826%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 94.164%

Yahoo has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.826%. The best response hour was at 5am with minimum and average latencies of 0.065425 and 0.188592 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 15.047513 and 0.443063 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.222 with a mean latency of 0.159 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Amazon.com has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.739%. The best response hour was at 4pm with minimum and average latencies of 0.081666 and 1.073651 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 15.029132 and 1.258213 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 1.037 with a mean latency of 0.181 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Best Buy has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.739%. The best response hour was at 1am with minimum and average latencies of 0.081204 and 0.495216 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 15.024076 and 0.778278 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.491 with a mean latency of 0.230 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

LookSmart has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.130%. The best response hour was at 7am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080422 and 0.728092 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 7pm with latencies of 15.050151 and 1.442379 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.989 with a mean latency of 0.625 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Akamai has provided their site users with what we deem as very good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 98.609%. The best response hour was at 9am with minimum and average latencies of 0.012453 and 0.275764 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 10pm with latencies of 20.146777 (we consider this unreachable) and 0.809036 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.537 with a mean latency of 0.453 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Lucent has provided their site users with what we deem as good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 94.164%. The best response hour was at 6am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080786 and 1.963655 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 4pm with latencies of 225.151402 (we consider this unreachable) and 6.713362 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 2.036 with a mean latency of 2.650 seconds, we consider this very good site delivery consistency for the day.

Disclaimer
This report is deemed accurate but due to the nature of networks and their underlying systems, in no way does it guarantee the quality of any individual user's browsing experience to any of the sites listed in this report. Note that all times shown are UTC.

About Busi-Bee.com
Busi-Bee.com provides host, network and protocol monitoring services with built in web analytics, and is based in San Diego, CA, with servers distributed across the US continent. Visit http://www.busi-bee.com/reports/ for the current QoS publication. To monitor your website, visit http://www.busi-bee.com/ and sign up today!

Copyright ©2006, Busi-Bee.com

# # #