New York Magazine, 3/27/2006, Validates 'A Real 9/11 Commission' Two 9/11 Fundamental Truths

Does New York Magazine writer Mark Jacobson realize that his March 27, 2006 article "9/11: Conspiracy Theorists Run Amok" proved the 9/11 assertions he thought he disproved?

Tuckahoe, NY (PRWEB) March 27, 2006 -- While author Paul J. Landis was preparing this press release for his updated book "A Real 9/11 Commission Will help Free America Now!", (ISBN 0-9760408-2-4, updated April 2007; US $14.75, UK, £ 9.85, www.areal911commission.com), New York Magazine, March 27, 2006 news stand date, published an article: "9/11: Conspiracy Theorists Run Amok" by Mark Jacobson. The result of this article however, is to validate the Two 9/11 foundation truths as determined by participants in "A Real 9/11 Commission". The Two 9/11 Fundamental Truths are: (1) No 757 hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, and (2) "Demolition charges" brought down the NYC Twin Towers, not the airplanes that hit them.

How does an article "9/11: Conspiracy Theorists Run Amok" do this wonderful service of revealing significant 9/11 truths to its readers and American citizens? Perhaps because even if Mr. Jacobson believed his title as he wrote his article and prepared the interview information, the truth, show in dramatic pictures, evidence, demanded to be known.

The towers did not collapse from natural forces, Bush just failed to tell us they were demolished. As long as Americans permit their negligent Congress to leave the PNAC Tyrants in power, there will be more 9/11's, continued War in Iraq, continued use of Depleted Uranium, actions against Iran and more drastic erosion of the US Constitution and our civil rights.

Is a picture still worth a thousand words? and can a picture dispel a thousand lies"? Yes, says author Landis, and "A Real 9/11 Commission" uses evidence to explain how.

On the bottom middle of pages 28 and 29 of "9/11: Conspiracy Theorists Run Amok" there are pictures before and with the explosion outside the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11/2001. The caption reads, "The plane that Bush told us hit the Pentagon isn't seen in any photographs. Some ask if it existed at all." "Bush told us" added by author Paul Landis.

The fact is, a 60 ton, 156 foot long 757 could not have been the cause of the explosion and not be in this explosion picture. A 757 is twice as long as the Pentagon is high. See "A Real 9/11 Commission" page 28.

In his section 10: Disinformation, Jacobson reports, "Talk came to a halt, however, with the mention of whether it was American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon 9/11." Jacobson then mentions Thierry Meyssan and his "Hunt the Boeing site" that asserts a 757 did not hit the Pentagon.

Jacobson continues: "But there are problems, such as many eyewitnesses who saw a plane flying low near the Pentagon shortly before impact".

Sloppy reasoning? asks author Landis. If spectators report a low flying "plane", they saw a low flying plane. Did they see a 757 or a "low flying plane"? Either way, the facts are: no 757 could have made the explosion and not be in the picture, and of the many pictures at the Pentagon after the explosion, including the one now on the cover of "A Real 9/11 Commission", none show any Evidence of a 757. Period. Flying low near the pentagon and not hitting the Pentagon is a possibility Jacobson and others in his article apparently did not or choose not to, consider.

Tragically, Landis asks, "This elaborate media fairy tale was ready to be used by the Bush administration to protect what actually happened to the real hijacked 757. Doesn't that provide evidence that they did indeed know these events were planned? And aren't Bush and Cheney the ones from whom Americans need to demand an answer to the question: 'Where is the 757 that was hijacked and what happened to the passengers'?"

Also on pages 28 and 29 there are pictures of the NYC Towers "collapse". The caption page 28 upper left, "the speed at which the towers came down …suggests controlled demolition..". On page 29 upper right, the caption asks if a "puff of smoke" below the symmetrical exploding structure, "could be evidence of an internal explosion consistent with controlled demolition"?

Landis suggests the reader visualize what the appearance of the "natural" collapse of the towers might look like, compared with the enormous energy, the symmetrical quality of the "explosive" collapse and recall that there are pictures of thousand pound steel beams are seen horizontally "shot like arrows" into nearby buildings". Also, "large sections of the North Tower's outer steel framework weigh hundreds of tons joined together. Where did the huge amount of energy come from to eject them roughly 600 feet, two football fields, through the air into the rooftop of the Winter garden?" ("911 Eyewitness", Richard A Siegel, www.911eyewitness.com).

Mr. Siegel also has captured the "sounds" and "timings" of the demolition charges that brought down the NYC Towers, including Magnitude 2.1 and 2.3 Richter scale explosions seventeen seconds before the collapse starts!

As Landis suggests we look at the Iraq war as a symptom, not the disease. The same is suggested as we look at the tragic events of September 11, 2001. The 'disease" Landis suggests Americans must "cure", remove, is the non-US constitution of Bush, Cheney and others: The Project for the New American Century (PNAC). This "project " calls for a "new Pearl Harbor" to scare Americans so that "project" supporters can create an Empire, USA. See "A Real 9/11 Commission" Pages 44 to 46.

"A 757 did not hit the Pentagon," Landis says. "The towers did not collapse from natural forces, Bush just failed to tell us they were demolished. As long as Americans permit their negligent Congress to leave the PNAC Tyrants in power, there will be more 9/11's, continued War in Iraq, continued use of Depleted Uranium, actions against Iran and more drastic erosion of the US Constitution and our civil rights."

The above referenced New York Magazine article is available at: http://www.newyorkmag.com/news/features/16464/index.html

The Constitution of Bush and Cheney is not the Constitution of the United States!
http://www.areal911commission.com/article5.html

# # #

Post Comment:
Trackback URL: http://www.prweb.com/pingpr.php/U2luZy1aZXRhLUZhbHUtVGhpci1IYWxmLVplcm8=

pentagon 9/11 landis real new york magazine american jacobson conspiracy theorists run theorists run amok commission

Bookmark -  Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl It | Spurl | RawSugar | Simpy | Shadows | Blink It | My Web

• Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton Invited to Participate in 'A Real 9/11 Commission' 2006-10-19
• To Mr. Charles Sheen, 'A Real 9/11 Commission' Participant -- Thank You 2006-03-27
• Author Paul J. Landis Reveals 9/11 Insights in New Book "A Real 9/11 Commission" 2005-07-27
• There is No Evidence a 757 Hit the Pentagon! Did Either Congress or the 9/11 Commission Look at the Pentagon Wall on or after September 11, 2001? 2005-04-21
• Bush Poll Numbers Show the Election Tragedy of 2004 Did Not Resolve Important US issues: Sept. 11 Questions, WMD Lies and the Iraq War and Why Another Stolen Election. 2005-04-15