Busi-Bee.com Website Quality of Service Report for Friday, September 29th, 2006

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that M-Wave (NASDAQ: MWAV) provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 99.913%, while Lucent (NYSE: LU) had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 93.362%

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) September 30, 2006 -- For this report made on Friday, September 29th, 2006, Busi-Bee.com took 18303 samples from the websites of M-Wave, Yahoo, Overstock.com, Blockbuster, LookSmart, and Lucent during the entire day of Thursday, September 28th, 2006, and analyzed the data to compile the following results in order of best QoS to worse, precluded by an overall summary as follows;

Through complex analysis, Busi-Bee.com (http://www.busi-bee.com/) has found that M-Wave provided the best overall quality of service (QoS) to their end users with a ranking of 99.913%, while Lucent had the lowest ranking relative to the companies referenced in this study with 93.362%

M-Wave has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.913%. The best response hour was at 3am with minimum and average latencies of 0.078914 and 0.258582 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 11pm with latencies of 11.413754 and 0.501503 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.290 with a mean latency of 0.164 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Yahoo has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.913%. The best response hour was at 5am with minimum and average latencies of 0.066206 and 0.143433 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 5pm with latencies of 7.503210 and 0.392741 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.192 with a mean latency of 0.127 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Overstock.com has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.912%. The best response hour was at 10am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080340 and 0.563014 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 9am with latencies of 6.045204 and 0.682558 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.573 with a mean latency of 0.154 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Blockbuster has provided their site users with what we deem as excellent quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 99.301%. The best response hour was at 10am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080659 and 0.170360 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 11pm with latencies of 237.209850 (we consider this unreachable) and 14.820425 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 0.826 with a mean latency of 7.333 seconds, we consider this bad site delivery consistency for the day. This is usually the result of some server down time within the day.

LookSmart has provided their site users with what we deem as very good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 98.341%. The best response hour was at 2pm with minimum and average latencies of 0.080702 and 1.324888 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 11pm with latencies of 20.012265 (we consider this unreachable) and 1.870542 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 1.133 with a mean latency of 0.629 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Lucent has provided their site users with what we deem as good quality of service yesterday, with an overall QoS ranking of 93.362%. The best response hour was at 6am with minimum and average latencies of 0.080142 and 1.759804 seconds respectively, and the worse hour being 11am with latencies of 50.897921 (we consider this unreachable) and 4.703891 seconds. The average latency for the day is about 2.135 with a mean latency of 1.933 seconds, we consider this excellent site delivery consistency for the day.

Disclaimer
This report is deemed accurate but due to the nature of networks and their underlying systems, in no way does it guarantee the quality of any individual user's browsing experience to any of the sites listed in this report. Note that all times shown are UTC.

About Busi-Bee.com
Busi-Bee.com provides host, network and protocol monitoring services with built in web analytics, and is based in San Diego, CA, with servers distributed across the US continent. Visit http://www.busi-bee.com/reports/ for the current QoS publication. To monitor your website, visit http://www.busi-bee.com/ and sign up today!

Copyright ©2006, Busi-Bee.com

# # #