Home
Learn More
Features & Pricing
Success Stories
Contact Us
Search Archives
PRWeb Direct
Submit Release
August 7, 2008
 
Industry Categories  
News by Country  
News by MSA  
Todays News  
Browse by Day  
PR Trackbacks™  
Featured Videos  
ViewNews™  
eBook Digests  
RSS  
PRWeb, a leader in online news and press release distribution, has been used by more than 40,000 organizations of all sizes to increase the visibility of their news, improve their search engine rankings and drive traffic to their Web site.
 
Close Move
All Press Releases for May 8, 2007 Subscribe to this News Feed      
 

How the US Search Marketing Industry Missed out on Nearly $11 Billion in 2006

New White Paper examines transatlantic 'search gap'; calls on search engines to do more UK-based development
A whole new sector has failed to thrive as effectively as it should have done, because the advertising industry in the US has adapted more slowly than in the UK

London, UK (PRWEB) May 8, 2007 -- The search industry in the US may have missed out on nearly $11 billion in 2006, according to Latitude Group's chief executive officer Dylan Thwaites.

The figure represents how much more US search engines would have earned if paid search penetration in the US was at UK levels.

Writing in a new Latitude White Paper* that explores the reasons behind the "search gap" between the US and UK search marketing industries, he says: "It is rare that the UK is a global market leader, but when this occurs, it almost without fail has an edge on service, creativity or innovation."

A greater reliance on in-house search skills is identified as one of the main reasons for the relative under-development of the US search market. The paper says: "The US has a much higher proportion of in-house search marketers, who tend to be less innovative and do not operate search as effectively as search agencies, slowing the flow of funds from other media."

Other key findings of the White Paper are:

  • Search engine commissions have had a firestarter effect on search penetration in the UK;
  • US search agencies have reacted slowly to the paid search opportunity;
  • Cost-per-click prices are marginally higher in the UK, but there is no evidence to show that the engines are abusing their market dominance.

Citing data produced continuously since 1997 by the Internet Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers (IAB/PwC), Mr Thwaites writes: "In 2006 American companies spent $6.7 billion on search marketing. The IAB/PwC figures show that search marketing spend in the US is 2.5 per cent of all advertising spend (40% of online which in turn is 6.3% of total advertising spend)."

He continues: "IAB/PwC figures released last month for the UK show that 11.4 per cent of all marketing spend is online, with search marketing at 57.8 per cent of all online. Therefore search engine marketing accounts for 6.6 per cent of all advertising spend. If the US market had achieved the penetration of the UK market, advertising budgets would almost triple."

According to Mr Thwaites, one of the chief causes of the "search gap" between the UK and US is conservatism within the US advertising industry: "A whole new sector has failed to thrive as effectively as it should have done, because the advertising industry in the US has adapted more slowly than in the UK," he says.

Another barrier in the US has been what Mr Thwaites calls 'organic inertia'. He writes: "When paid search was developed in 2000 there was no fanfare. However, there was one set of people who detested the concept. Organic search optimisers had spent up to five years unpicking the search algorithms of Alta Vista, Lycos, Hotbot and others. Then, overnight, they were knocked off top position by some techno-illiterate paying one cent to place his website above the organic master. Instead of grabbing this amazing new tool and adding it to the armoury, most organic optimisers turned their back on the devil."

With the UK market being so much more mature and competitive than the US, Mr Thwaites urges US-based search engines such as Ask to do more research and development in Britain. "There is no doubt that the engines would get a much more positive and synergistic response if testing was UK-based," he says.

*'An analysis of the $11bn revenue shortfall in the US search marketing industry', April 2007

About Latitude
Headquartered in London, with offices in Warrington, Cheshire, and more than 100 employees, Latitude's unrivalled PPC and SEO expertise enables its clients to obtain consistently superior returns from their investment in search engine marketing. In 2007 the agency won the Netimperative 'Search Campaign of the Year' award; it also won a Media Momentum Award as Britain's fastest growing digital media company in 2006 (shortlisted again in 2007) and its Chief Executive Officer, Dylan Thwaites, was chosen as the 2006 Ernst & Young Technology & Communications Entrepreneur of the Year.

Enquiries
Please call Stephen Powers at Latitude Group Ltd on 020 7952 8037, or email stephen.powers @ latitudegroup.com

###

Post Comment:
Trackback URL: http://www.prweb.com/pingpr.php/U3F1YS1Db3VwLUNyYXMtUHJvZi1NYWduLVplcm8=

Technorati Tags

Bookmark -  Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl It | Spurl | RawSugar | Simpy | Shadows | Blink It | My Web


OPTIONS
Printer Friendly Version
Download PDF Version
Download Reader Version
BlogThis
ShareIt

Share The News

Submit this press release easily to any of these major bookmarking and social media sites.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Stephen Powers
Latitude Group Ltd
020 7952 8037
Email us Here
ATTACHED FILES

US Search Marketing Shortfall
An analysis of the $11bn revenue shortfall in the US search marketing industry.

ABOUT PRESS RELEASES
If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release. Please do not contact PRWeb. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry. PRWeb disclaims any content contained in these releases. Our complete disclaimer appears here.
 
Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release.
Please do not contact PRWeb®. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry.
PRWeb® disclaims any content contained in these releases. Our complete disclaimer appears here.

© Copyright 1997-2008, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright