OCC: FirstEnergy Not Allowed to Collect Billions in Future Costs, Generation Rates Reduced

The Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) is pleased that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) agreed with many of its arguments related to generation rates, deferrals and distribution rates when issuing its decision on FirstEnergy’s electric security plan today. (Reference No. O8-0935-EL-SSO)

Columbus, OH (Vocus/PRWEB ) December 22, 2008 -- The Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) is pleased that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) agreed with many of its arguments related to generation rates, deferrals and distribution rates when issuing its decision on FirstEnergy’s electric security plan today. (Reference No. O8-0935-EL-SSO) Generation rates for FirstEnergy’s electric security plan will be adjusted downward from the proposed rates, the utility will not be allowed to defer costs into the future, and distribution rates will be decided in a separate case.

The OCC argued many of these issues in order to protect consumers from paying billions of dollars in highly inflated projections

By agreeing with the OCC, FirstEnergy customers will receive a decrease from the proposed generation rates which we believe is justified by the record in this case.

The deferrals that FirstEnergy requested could have resulted in customers paying more than $2 billion in future charges that would have resulted in excessive and unfair profits

By eliminating all of the deferrals, consumers will avoid being saddled with these unnecessary costs that they would have been required to pay over 25 years with interest.

The OCC also argued, and the PUCO agreed, that FirstEnergy’s proposal to defer billions of dollars was unwarranted and that it needed to separate FirstEnergy’s distribution rate case from the electric security plan.

“The deferrals that FirstEnergy requested could have resulted in customers paying more than $2 billion in future charges that would have resulted in excessive and unfair profits,” Migden-Ostrander said. “By eliminating all of the deferrals, consumers will avoid being saddled with these unnecessary costs that they would have been required to pay over 25 years with interest.”

With respect to the distribution rate case, removing the distribution rate proposal from this generation plan, was the right thing to do. This case has already been fully litigated in a separate proceeding and the OCC has recommended a substantially lower rate increase than what FirstEnergy had proposed.

About the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel:
The Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC), the residential utility consumer advocate, represents the interests of 4.5 million households in proceedings before state and federal regulators and in the courts. The state agency also educates consumers about electric, natural gas, telephone and water issues and resolves complaints from individuals. To receive utility information, brochures, schedule a presentation or file a utility complaint, residential consumers may call 1-877-PICKOCC (1-877-742-5622) toll free in Ohio or visit the OCC Web site at www.pickocc.org.

Contact:
Anthony Rodriguez
(614) 466-9547

###

Post Comment:
Trackback URL: http://www.prweb.com/pingpr.php/RW1wdC1Ib3JyLVByb2YtU2luZy1Ib3JyLVNpbmctWmVybw==

occ ohio consumers counsel electricity public utilities electric security plan public utilities commission of ohio puco firstenergy

Bookmark -  Del.icio.us | Furl It | Technorati | Ask | MyWeb | Propeller | Live Bookmarks | Newsvine | TailRank | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Stumbleupon | Google Bookmarks | Sphere | Blink It | Spurl

• Ohio Consumers' Counsel Says PUCO Should Deny Frontier, Verizon Telephone Merger without Consumer Protections 2009-08-19
• Ohio Consumers' Counsel: Approval of Duke Electric Distribution Rate Case Agreement to Benefit Residential Consumers 2009-07-09
• Ohio Consumers' Counsel Opposes Level of Ormet Electric Discount to be Paid by AEP Customers 2009-07-02
• Approval Of Dayton Power & Light Rate Plan Will Benefit Residential Customers 2009-06-25
• Consumers' Counsel Reacts to Denial of Request to Halt AEP's Retroactive Rates 2009-06-19