MJQLAW Filing Lawsuits on Behalf of Women Injured By Transvaginal Mesh

The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan are currently filing lawsuits on behalf of California women who have suffered injuries related to vaginal mesh complications after surgery.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Matt Quinlan

The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan are representing women injured by defective transvaginal mesh...

Quote startI have handled many different types of mass tort actions against various pharmceutical manufacturers over the years, but these injuries are some of the most debilitating I have seen.Quote end

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) August 02, 2012

The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan are currently representing California women who have suffered injuries related to vaginal/sling mesh complications after surgery. According to firm founder, Matt Quinlan, "[w]e are in the process of filing dozens of transvaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of women, and their partners, who have been injured by defective mesh." He added, "I have handled many different types of mass tort actions against various pharmaceutical manufacturers over the years, but these injuries are some of the most debilitating I have seen." Some common post-surgical complications that clients of The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan have experienced include:

  • Vaginal mesh erosion
  • Pain
  • Infection
  • Bleeding
  • Organ perforation
  • Recurrent prolapse
  • Neuro-muscular problems
  • Vaginal scarring/shrinkage
  • Emotional problems
  • Urinary problems

Implanted and stretched across the vaginal wall, transvaginal mesh patches are designed to support internal organs that have been damaged. Unfortunately, a number of serious injuries have been reported in connection with these devices including mesh erosion, serious infection and the return of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). To date, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has received nearly 4,000 reports of significant complications associated with transvaginal mesh patches. Further, The FDA has warned that the use of transvaginal mesh can expose patients to a greater risk of complications than other methods of surgical vaginal repair. The agency stated that in spite of the increased side effects risk, transvaginal mesh repair surgery carries no addition benefits compared to other stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or POP surgeries.

If you have suffered from vaginal mesh complications that occurred after POP and SUI surgical repairs please contact us for a free, confidential no-obligation consultation. The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan is currently accepting new transvaginal mesh claims against the following manufacturers:

C.R. Bard:
•Avaulta Plus™ BioSynthetic Support System
•Avaulta Solo™ Synthetic Support System
•Faslata® Allograft
•Pelvicol® Tissue
•PelviSoft® Biomesh
•Pelvitex™ Polypropylene Mesh

Johnson & Johnson:
•Ethicon TVT
•Gynecare TVT
•Gynemesh PS
•Prolene Polypropylene Mesh Patch
•Secur

American Medical Systems (AMS):
•Apogee Vault Suspension System
•Elevate Prolapse Repair System
•Monarc Sling System
•Perigee System
•Sparc Sling System

Boston Scientific:
•Advantage™ Sling System
•Obtryx® Curved Single
•Obtryx® Mesh Sling
•Prefyx Mid U™ Mesh Sling System
•Prefyx PPS™ System

The Law Offices of Matthew J. Quinlan is a boutique personal injury law firm, headquarted in San Francisco, CA, focusing on catastrophic personal injury cases and various products liability actions, including vaginal mesh lawsuits. MJQLAW has a reputation as tough and tireless advocates for the catastrophically injured.