Transvaginal Mesh: New Lawsuit on Severe Complications

According to court documents, on August 7th, 2012, Arizona resident Mary Higbee filed a lawsuit in Georgia Middle District Court (case no. 4:2012cv00198) alleging she suffered severe complications from her transvaginal mesh. Transvaginal surgical mesh is used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). On July 26th, 2012, Bloomberg reported that, according to California Jury, Christine Scott and her husband deserved $5.5 million damage award because of injuries caused by Bard’s Avaulta Plus vaginal implant (case no. S-1500-CV-266034). Now, AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, can provide helpful, proven advice and simple solutions including how to get in contact with legal counsel so anyone can easily and inexpensively deal with cases of Transvaginal Mesh severe adverse events. [http://www.attorneyone.com/transvaginal-surgical-mesh-lawsuit/

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Transvaginal Mesh: serious complications

Transvaginal Mesh: serious complications

it is not clear that transvaginal POP repair with mesh is more effective than traditional non-mesh repair in all patients with POP and it may expose patients to greater risk

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) September 04, 2012

The media spotlight is often a double-edged sword. No one knows this better than Mary Higbee. And yet, gossip and rumor-mongering aside, the real story here is being overlooked according to Sean Burke of AttorneyOne.

According to court documents, on August 7th, 2012, Arizona resident Mary Higbee filed a lawsuit in Georgia Middle District Court (case no. 4:2012cv00198) alleging she suffered severe complications from her transvaginal Mesh. Transvaginal surgical mesh is used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). In the lawsuit Higbee claims she suffered from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and in October 2004 she was implanted with the ObTape vaginal sling device. Plaintiff claims that the ObTape sling caused her various severe problems, including infections, bleeding and mesh erosion leading to multiple surgeries.

On July 26th, 2012, Bloomberg reported that, according to California Jury, Christine Scott and her husband deserved $5.5 million damage award because of injuries caused by Bard’s Avaulta Plus vaginal implant (case no. S-1500-CV-266034).

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, can provide helpful advice and simple solutions including how to get in contact with legal counsel so that, in case of severe adverse events from Transvaginal Mesh, someone can easily and inexpensively deal with it. As Mr. Burke, director of Media Relations for AttorneyOne.com, added, “What all this information really illustrates is that threat from Transvaginal Mesh remains. For that reason, our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On July 13, 2011 an FDA Safety Communication update was issued to inform the medical community and patients that serious complications associated with surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP are not rare. The FDA added that it is not clear that transvaginal POP repair with mesh is more effective than traditional non-mesh repair in all patients with POP and it may expose patients to greater risk.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Transvaginal Mesh lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/8/prweb9824068.htm.