(PRWEB) March 13, 2013
Made by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Mirena IUD was approved as a contraceptive by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000 to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women*. The small, plastic t-shaped device is inserted into the uterus by a healthcare provider, where it may remain for up to 5 years. As reported by the FDA, the Mirena IUD has allegedly been linked to serious side effects, such as uterine perforation, embedment, hysterectomy, risk of infertility, intrauterine pregnancy, streptococcal sepsis, pelvic inflammatory disease, severe pain, possible risk of rheumatoid arthritis, breast cancer and other cancers*.
In January 16th, 2013, many of the plaintiffs in Mirena lawsuits petitioned for the establishment of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Ohio. The petition estimates that with more than 2 million users of the device, hundreds of Mirena perforation cases could be filed. (In Re: Mirena IUD Product Liability Litigation, Case No. 1:12-CV-2780). A Joint Panel on the MDL has scheduled a hearing for March 21, 2013 to decide whether cases will be consolidated to one court and where the trial will be taking place. Due to the complexity of the cases, DrugRisk Resource Center recommends that consumers find lawyers who are already handling the Mirena cases to join this MDL if it is formed*. These collective lawsuits all allege that Bayer, the Mirena IUD manufacturer, misled the consumers by overstating the efficacy of Mirena, while still knowing and understating the potential for safety concerns. They also claim that they suffered serious injuries after the Mirena IUD perforated the uterine wall and migrated away from its original position. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Morris County (Civil Action No. MRS-L-272412).
According to Injury Lawyer News Mirena’s potential complications may lead to severe pain, bleeding, and the need for surgical removal of the device*. The online source then goes on to state how these side effects may last long after the device had been removed and may even lead to infertility*. While the drug’s label warns against the potential migration of the device, it only talks about when uterus is perforated during the insertion procedure. The misleading warning does not alert patients to the possibility of spontaneous migration with no cause except for the malfunctioning of the IUD as Injury Lawyer News states in its article “Mirena Lawsuit Alleges IUD Migration Led to Multiple Complications*.”
d’Oliveira and Associates is a law firm that is working with some of the leading attorneys in the United States for dangerous drug, defective medical products and medical malpractice cases. The firm also focuses on personal injury cases, including auto accidents, slip and falls, dog bites, as well as social security disability cases.
For a free consultation, call 1-800-992-6878 or visit their website at dmlaw.com.