Tenant Screening Firm Urges NYC Landlords to Review Rental Agreements

Share Article

Tenant Background Search, a firm that helps landlords to effectively screen tenants, urges New York City landlords to maintain compliance with the Tenant Fair Chance Act so that they are not vulnerable to potential legal action.

News Image
NYC landlords may still not be in compliance and are opening themselves up to a legal action against which they will have little defense

Tenant Background Search, a Texas firm with a national client base, has called for New York City landlords to review their rental agreements to ensure compliance with the Tenant Fair Chance Act. While the NYC City Council passed the law in March 2010, one NYC law firm, Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., who reviewed his own client’s documents more than two years after the fact, found errors and legal exposures on each document screened.

Jeff LeVan, of Tenant Background Search, said, “The Tenant Fair Chance Act forces landlords to disclose on their applications if they use a consumer reporting agency, as well as that agency’s full name and address. Additionally,” LeVan said, “if the landlord uses information in the report to take adverse action against the rental applicant, the landlord must notify the applicant of the adverse action. The applicant is then entitled to the name and address of the credit reporting agency that provided the information so the applicant can inspect the report and challenge it for correction.”

According to LeVan, the Tenant Fair Chance Act came out of a class-action lawsuit filed against First Advantage SafeRent, Inc. (FAS), in 2006. The suit, White and Jackson-Daniels, et al. v. First Advantage SafeRent, Inc., (Civil Case No. 04 CV 1611) heard in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleged that FAS background checks included housing court histories without clearly defining the outcomes of such legal actions.

“In essence, the suit charged that prospective tenants were being ‘blacklisted’ for having filed a lawsuit against their landlord, even if the legal action never went to trial or if the tenant was found to have a valid action,” said LeVan. He added, “Additionally, the suit states the plaintiffs were not accurately identified because housing court cases in New York are listed by name and not by social security number, so it was not uncommon that a prospective tenant was being judged on judicial action taken by someone else with the same name.”

FAS lost the class-action suit in 2007 and was forced to settle by paying $1.9 million dollars.

Now, three years after the law has been passed, LeVan cites proof of the NYC law firm audit that NYC landlords my still not be in compliance and are opening themselves up to a legal action against which they will have little defense. “It’s avoidable,” said LeVan. “All landlords have to do is use their legal resources and be pro-active in staying out of the court system. The bright side of the Tenant Fair Chance Act,” continues LeVan, “is that landlords will be able to rent to good tenants who may have been mis-identified as high risk under the previous guidelines. After all, the purpose of doing background screenings is to be able to find qualified tenants. These legal changes will increase the chances of that,” he said.

TenantBackgroundSearch.com performs comprehensive background checks on potential renters to assist landlords in making an informed rental decision. Report topics include credit, national criminal database, sexual offender database, Patriot Act search, bankruptcy, foreclosures, medical collections, employment summary, known aliases, past addresses and eviction history. Located in Dallas, the firm has a national clientele.

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Marianne Rittner
Visit website