MG&M Achieves Significant Mississippi Supreme Court Judgment on behalf of the Mississippi Department of Transportation

Share Article

Manion Gaynor & Manning (MG&M) obtained a significant judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of Mississippi on behalf of its clients, the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) and Mississippi Transportation Commission (MTC).

Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP

Manion Gaynor & Manning (MG&M) obtained a significant judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of Mississippi on behalf of its clients, the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) and Mississippi Transportation Commission (MTC). In Chantel Jobes v. MDOT, MTCB# 2011-0000832, the State Supreme Court overturned a Lamar County Circuit Court ruling and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants, MDOT/MTC. In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that while MDOT’s duty to maintain a highway was not discretionary, the plaintiff failed to show that MDOT had a duty, breached that duty, or that any breach caused the plaintiff’s injury.

Interestingly, the laws concerning governmental immunity for certain activities related to highway maintenance and construction had changed during the pendency of MDOT’s present appeal. Within the present opinion the Court re-affirmed its recent ruling in Little v. Mississippi Department of Transportation, 129 So. 3d 132 (Miss. 2013), holding that MDOT was “not entitled to discretionary-function immunity for failure to properly maintain and repair the highways because that function is ministerial.” However, the Court granted the appeal based on Jobes’ inability to prove that MDOT owed a duty, breached a duty, or that any such breach caused her injuries, and in so doing further clarified those circumstances under which some governmental immunities still exist under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act.

Specifically, the State Supreme Court held that MDOT was immune from suit for all allegations and activities related to the type, number and location of protective and traffic control devices, including warning signs, illumination devices, guardrails and crash cushions, pursuant to MS Code Ann. §§63-3-303, 65-1-175(3), and 11-46-9(1)(d).

MG&M’s team was led by MG&M partner Chris Massenburg.

Share article on socal media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Clodagh Boyle
Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP
Like >
Follow us on
Visit website