Hull Barrett’s David E. Hudson Successfully Opposes Class Certification Motion

Share Article

David E. Hudson garners class certification denial for nationwide mortgage lender client.

News Image
construction, repair, rehabilitation or purchase of property.

In December 2009, a borrower from a national mortgage lender filed a complaint as a putative class representative alleging the mortgage lender violated the National Housing Act (NHA). The borrower alleged that the lender made the loan under section 203(b) and improperly charged up-front mortgage insurance premiums at the time of closing as opposed to offering the borrower a loan under section 238(c) that allows these payments to be made over time. Section 238(c) applies only to six counties in Georgia and New York that have been designated as “military impact counties.” The borrower’s loan was secured by a home in one of those counties in Georgia.

Mr. David E. Hudson and Hull Barrett represented the lender and argued that class certification should be denied because there is no implied private right of action for a violation of this provision of the NHA. Further, Mr. Hudson claimed that even if the plaintiff had a justifiable claim, section 238(c) loans applied only for “construction, repair, rehabilitation or purchase of property.” Of the 145 loans made by the lender in the six counties, all but nine were for refinancing and thus the case failed the “numerosity” requirement to be certified as a class action. In an order dated October 7, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia agreed that the case was not suitable for class certification and denied plaintiff’s class certification motion. 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 107188.

Mr. Hudson practices in the area of general civil litigation with an emphasis on business and commercial disputes, media law and construction law. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 1971, and has been a trial lawyer since 1974 representing clients at the trial court level in Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, and New York. He has also argued numerous appeals in the appellate courts of Georgia, the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fifth and Eleventh Circuits, and a case before the Supreme Court of the United States.

About Hull Barrett, PC:
Hull Barrett, PC is a full service law firm with 28 attorneys firm wide. The firm is engaged in a general civil practice providing a broad range of legal services with an emphasis on general litigation, trials and appeals; securities and corporate law; mergers, acquisitions and public offerings; local government law and eminent domain actions; health care; computer and technology law; internet ventures; trademark and copyright law; taxation; public finance; commercial real estate; construction law and disputes; employment law; banking law; insurance law; trusts, estate planning and probate; First Amendment and media law and environmental matters. Hull Barrett represents a broad client base of major corporations, small businesses, professional entities, financial and lending institutions, local governments, public authorities, public utilities, railroad companies, insurance companies, health care institutions and individuals.

Hull Barrett is also a member of the International Society of Primerus Law Firms (Primerus), the leading alliance of small and medium-sized, top-rated, independent firms. Primerus has 160 law firms located in Canada, China, Cyprus, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Mexico, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Switzerland, and 44 states in the United States. Primerus firms provide clients with responsive, partner-level service at reasonable fees. Law firms in the U.S. and Canada must be AV-rated using the Martindale-Hubbell peer review service. For firms outside of North America, consideration is given to respected resources, such as Chambers Global Guide, Legal 500 EMEA, and IFLR 1000. Additionally, once approved for membership, every Primerus firm is audited annually to ensure that the legal services they continue to provide to clients are of a consistent, high quality, year after year. Each member is committed to the following standards: Integrity, Excellent Work Product, Reasonable Fees, Continuing Legal Education, Civility and Community Service.


Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Erica M. Kusmierz

Amy E. Trevino