We have heard from many young women who have suffered uterine perforations and other serious injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. We will continue to investigate these claims.
New York, New York (PRWEB) January 11, 2013
The New Jersey Supreme Court has denied Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical’s petition to have all Mirena IUD lawsuits filed in the state consolidated in a single proceeding in Middlesex County Superior Court. In a notice dated January 8th, the Court directed that all Mirena lawsuits should continue to be filed in appropriate counties of venue. (In re Application for Centralized Management of Certain Cases Involving Mirena - N.J. Sup. Ct.)*
“We have heard from many young women who have suffered uterine perforations and other serious injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. We will continue to investigate these claims,” says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical device. The Firm is currently offering free legal evaluations to victims of alleged Mirena complications.
Mirena IUD Lawsuits
Bayer petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court for consolidation of Mirena lawsuits in August 2012. According to the petition, 16 Mirena lawsuits were pending in New Jersey at that time, most in Morris County. Seven additional lawsuits were pending in courts around the country. All of the claims allege plaintiffs suffered serious Mirena complications as a result of misplacement of the IUD, according to Bayer.**
The Mirena IUD is a small, hormone-releasing, t-shaped device that is inserted into the uterus by a healthcare provider, where it may remain for up to 5 years. Mirena was approved as a contraceptive by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, and is now used by some 2 million women, according to Bayer. In 2009, its approval was expanded to include treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women who wish to use an IUD as their method of birth control. That same year, the FDA issued a warning letter to Bayer after finding that one of its Mirena promotions overstated the IUD’s benefits and minimized its risks.***
Young women who used Mirena and suffered device migration, uterine perforations, ectopic pregnancy or other serious injuries may be entitled to file their own Mirena IUD lawsuit seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. Learn more about Mirena complications by visiting Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s Mirena IUD lawsuit website. For additional information, contact a lawyer at Bernstein Liebhard LLP today by calling (877) 779-1414.
About Bernstein Liebhard LLP
Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the “Plaintiffs’ Hot List,” recognizing the top plaintiffs’ firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2013 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, (212) 779-1414. The lawyer responsible for this advertisement in the State of Connecticut is Amy L. Abate. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Felecia L. Stern, Esq.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP