Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on Increasing Number of Mirena IUD Lawsuits and Complaints

Share Article

The firm is actively filing Mirena IUD lawsuits on behalf of women who suffered serious Mirena side effects allegedly as a result of implantation of the device.

The firm is actively filing Mirena IUD lawsuits on behalf of women who suffered serious Mirena side effects allegedly as a result of implantation of the device.

The firm is actively filing Mirena IUD lawsuits on behalf of women who suffered serious Mirena side effects allegedly as a result of implantation of the device.

I expect the number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts to increase, especially when you consider the growing number of complaints to the FDA.

As complaints mount and federal litigation grows, the Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a Mirena IUD law firm, notes that more women are filing Mirena IUD injury lawsuits. The firm, which maintains the Mirena IUD Lawsuit Center, is actively monitoring lawsuit developments and offering its insight into Mirena IUD news.

To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has received more than 70,000 complaints about the Mirena hormonal IUD, according to NBC 5.* Lawsuits filed in federal courts have exceeded 50. This milestone follows an April consolidation of those cases into one court under a single judge, according to court records for In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation (MDL-2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York).

The complaints and lawsuits, according to NBC 5 and the federal court documents, center on a few major alleged side effects, including device migration and uterine perforation. There is also the possibility of the device’s becoming embedded in other parts of the body after leaving the uterus, according to the allegations in the documents.

“The women who contact our firm to file Mirena lawsuits allege those side effects and others,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. “I expect the number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts to increase, especially when you consider the growing number of complaints to the FDA.”

More than 60 Mirena lawsuits were consolidated in May 2013 in New Jersey Superior Court in Bergen County, according to court documents in In re Mirena Litigation (Case No. 297, Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County). In both the federal and state consolidations, the lawsuits are not class actions. It is a method for improving efficiency and reducing costs for pretrial proceedings. Each case has the potential to go to trial with potential compensation for each plaintiff.

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages those with the Mirena hormonal IUD to visit this page to download a free informational brochure about the device and users’ eligibility to file a lawsuit.

*nbcnews.com/id/52236628/#.UcC8cYletEI

For the latest news on defective medications and medical devices and related lawsuits, visit the Rottenstein Law Group LLP’s Injury Lawyer Newswire at injurylawyernewswire.com. Readers can subscribe to the news site’s stories and videos to stay on top of personal injury news.

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP
The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-based firm that represents clients nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent clients hurt by defective medical devices and medications. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.)

Contact:
The Rottenstein Law Group LLP
Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.
321 W. 44th Street
# 804
New York NY 10036
(212) 933-9500 (office phone)
(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)
rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.
Follow us on
Visit website