Reports A 70 Percent Spike In Mortgage Complaints Over Last Year; Lawsuits Alleging Bank Misconduct Continue To Be Filed

Share Article

Big banks and major lenders have been besieged by allegations of fraud, predatory lending and other acts of misconduct stemming from the 2008 financial crisis. While a number of large mortgage lawsuit settlements have been announced and penalties doled out, mortgage complaint data suggest Americans continue to be negatively impacted by the mortgage crisis--and some are seeking legal help.

While the aftermath of the sub-prime mortgage crisis has seen a number of large U.S. banks defending themselves against charges of misconduct, new data reported by indicates consumers are still being impacted by the crisis. Mortgage-related complaints submitted to the legal news website have continued to increase year-over-year as readers continue to seek out legal help in dealing with foreclosures and discriminatory lending practices. has reported a 70 percent jump in mortgage complaints from January through June 2012 compared with the same period a year ago. In addition, mortgage complaints to the website have risen 114 percent so far this year vs. a similar period five years ago, in 2007. Complaints are submitted to the legal news website in order to seek legal help.

There are three primary categories for which mortgage complaints to continue to be submitted:

1. Predatory and Discriminatory Mortgage Lending. One example of a mortgage lawsuit involving discrimination was the recent U.S. Department of Justice case involving Wells Fargo (United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (D.D.C.)). The case was the second largest fair lending settlement in the department’s history. As part of the discriminatory lending settlement, Wells Fargo agreed to pay $175 million to settle allegations that it charged African-Americans and Hispanics higher fees and rates on mortgages than for Caucasian borrowers with similar credit profiles. Wells Fargo stated its intent to settle the mortgage lawsuit was to avoid contested litigation, and that it treated all clients fairly without regard to race or ethnicity. This, in spite of the large numbers of discriminatory lending victims uncovered by a government investigation.

In addition to racial discriminatory lending complaints, has also received predatory lending complaints from seniors who allege they have been targeted with products ranging from mortgages with an introductory low rate (that rises substantially later on), to reverse mortgages that eat up a homeowner's equity—sometimes without the homeowner fully realizing the true source of the nonetheless welcomed income.

Wells Fargo was the target of a reverse mortgage lawsuit last year in Chandler v. Wells Fargo & Co., Case No. 11-cv-03831, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco). The mortgage lawsuit, which was filed as a class action, is still pending. It accuses Wells Fargo of disregarding federal rules on reverse mortgages and forcing homeowners into foreclosure instead of giving heirs a chance to buy the homes.

2. Foreclosures. Foreclosure complaints comprise the second category contributing to the rise in mortgage-related complaints submitted at One foreclosure lawsuit recently filed by Jay Fenello of Woodstock, Georgia (Fenello v. Bank of America, Case No. 1:11-cv-04139-WSD, U.S. District Court, Northern Division, Georgia) alleges Bank of America has been acting in violation of the terms for foreclosure procedure set forth in U.S. et al v. Bank of America Corp., et al (Case No. 1:12-cv-00361-RMC, U.S. District Court, D.C.). In the filing, Fenello's allegations center on attempts made by Bank of America to foreclose on his home while engaging in illegal and unethical practices, including misrepresenting eligibility criteria for loan modifications.

3. Investment Loss Stemming from Mortgage-backed Securities. The failure of mortgage-backed securities stemming from the sub-prime mortgage meltdown of a few years ago has left many investors with substantial losses after being advised that such securities were low-, or even no-risk investments. In re Lehman Brothers Mortgage-based Securities Litigation, Case No. 08-CV-6762, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit were awarded $40 million in damages. continues to receive complaints regarding mortgage-backed security financial losses from its readership.

About provides comprehensive legal news and critical information for those affected by once-in-a-lifetime situations involving medical device lawsuits, personal injury, defective products, California overtime and labor issues or a host of others. Readers seeking legal help can request it by completing a form which is distributed to attorneys specializing in these cases. Trial attorneys utilize the site to keep abreast of hot legal issues and settlements as well as connect with potential clients.

About Online Legal Media
Online Legal Media owns and operates websites providing information for the general public and the legal community., founded in 2001, is an online legal news publication with over 2.5 million visitors annually and hundreds of thousands of requests for attorney help from its readership. serves as a portal for trial attorneys to network and to market their firms to other attorneys and legal professionals. offers up-to-date resources and news for those suffering from asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. Online Legal Media is based in Santa Cruz, California.

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

John Sliney. COO
Follow us on
Visit website