New Lawsuit on Mirena IUD Uterine Perforation: Now AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

According to court documents, on March 25th, 2013 a woman filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court alleging she suffered perforation of the uterus from Mirena IUD. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Mirena IUD serious complications.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Mirena: serious complications

Mirena: serious complications

alleging she suffered perforation of the uterus from Mirena IUD

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) April 10, 2013

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD Lawsuits.

According to court documents, on March 25th, 2013 a woman filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (case no. 2:2013cv01530) alleging she suffered perforation of the uterus from Mirena IUD. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method.

In the lawsuit, plaintiff claims she had the Mirena IUD inserted into her uterus in January 2011 and in December 2012 she was diagnosed with uterine perforation by her Mirena IUD.

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in case of alleged Mirena IUD severe complications. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations for AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

As the Mayo Clinic informs, side effects associated with Mirena IUD include: headache, acne, breast tenderness, breakthrough bleeding, absence of periods (amenorrhea), ovarian cysts, and abdominal or pelvic pain, among others. Removal of Mirena IUD may be recommended in case of pelvic infection, inflammation of the endometrium, endometrial or cervical cancer, and uterine or cervical perforation.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10608715.htm