Zoloft Birth Defects Allegation Lawsuits Update from Resource4thePeople: Federal Judge Schedules 2014 Trials

Bellwether trials put on track as test cases in consolidated federal litigation involving hundreds of lawsuits claiming anti-depressant use allegedly caused birth defects. Free consultations about legal options are now available to consumers.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) April 25, 2013

http://www.resource4thepeople.com/defectivedrugs/zoloft.html

Resource4thePeople today announced its latest consumer update about a federal multidistrict litigation* involving lawsuits claiming that the use of Zoloft or similar anti-depressants classified as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) allegedly can cause birth defects in infants.

The latest information in the multidistrict litigation – which involves consolidation of hundreds of cases from across the country – is that bellwether trials have now been rescheduled to begin in October of 2014.

The multi-district litigation is being coordinated under the jurisdiction of U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia M. Rufe in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

“Judge Rufe has scheduled these trials so that attorneys for the plaintiffs and the defendant can test the strength and weaknesses of their cases before juries,” said Resource4thePeople.

“This is an important step forward in the process of this litigation in which consumers are claiming links between the use of Zoloft and other SSRIs during pregnancies and birth defects in their infants.”

Resource4thePeople also notes that that the court files* in the case show that there are now over 300 cases consolidated by the federal court system in the litigation.

Resource4thePeople also is announcing that as this litigation moves forward its nationwide team of attorneys is continuing to review claims from consumers who are alleging their children may have suffered birth defects caused by the mother's use of Zoloft or other SSRIs.

"A common question we have been receiving from consumers involves the question of how their legal rights may be affected by the progress of this litigation,” said Resource4thePeople.

“Every case is different but we are continuing to offer free consultations to consumers to help provide them the information they need to preserve all of their legal options over allegations involving the use of SSRIs.”

These consultations can provide legal options about whether such families may be eligible to seek compensation for medical costs, pain and suffering and other expenses that may stem from these circumstances.

Each of the plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation is seeking at least $75,000 in damages, according to the court files. The manufacturers of Zoloft have denied the allegations.

SSRI anti-depressants are the newest class of anti-depressants and are sold under various brand and generic drug names such as Zoloft, Prozac, Paxil, Lexapro and Depakote. The National Institute of Mental Health describes these medications as the most popular antidepressants.**

The common allegations in the Zoloft multidistrict litigation* are that women who used Zoloft to treat depression while pregnant were put at increased risk of giving birth to an infant suffering from birth defects such as cleft palate, club foot, spina bifida and heart and abdominal defects, according to the claims in the court files.

Also claimed in these court filings are allegations that some infants may have been born suffering from the life-threatening condition known as pulmonary hypertension in newborns (PPHN).

This condition, according to the Food and Drug Administration, occurs when a newborn baby does not adapt to breathing outside the womb.**

The FDA says that newborns with PPHN may require intensive care support including a mechanical ventilator to increase their oxygen level. If severe, PPHN can result in multiple organ damage, including brain damage, and even death.

Resource4thePeople notes that the FDA has given mixed signals about the link between PPHN and SSRI use. In 2006 the agency issued a warning about the dangers of SSRI use and PPHN. Now the FDA says it is unsure.***

Here is the most recent statement by the FDA, released on Dec. 14, 2011:

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is updating the public on the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants by women during pregnancy and the potential risk of a rare heart and lung condition known as persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). The initial Public Health Advisory in July 2006 on this potential risk was based on a single published study. Since then, there have been conflicting findings from new studies evaluating this potential risk, making it unclear whether use of SSRIs during pregnancy can cause PPHN.”

Resource4thePeople also is bringing to the attention of SSRI patients new medical research data that raises concerns about whether the anti-depressants may also put patients at increased risk of suffering heart arrhythmia.

These concerns are raised in published reports of a medical research study in the Jan. 29, 2013 British Medical Journal.

According to the study, the SSRIs citalopram (brand name Celexa) and escitalopram (brand name Lexapro) “trigger a disturbance in QT interval (the duration of electrical activity of the heart muscle) heart rhythms.”

The medical research report's lead study author Dr. Roy Perlis and his colleagues “confirmed through analysis a slight but significant QT prolongation with higher doses of citalopram,” saying that “although some QT variation is normal, a longer interval can upset timing of the heartbeat and lead to dizziness, fainting, and depending on severity, sudden death.”

The researchers also reported that citalopram, escitalopram, and amitriptyline were associated with prolongation of corrected QT interval, which is a marker of increased ventricular arrhythmia risk.

The report emphasized that other antidepressants, including some other SSRIs, were not identified as causing significantly associated with prolonged corrected QT intervals.

Sources:
*In Re: Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Products Liability Litigation - MDL 2342, United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
**http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/mental-health-medications/complete-index.shtml
***http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm283375.htm
**** http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm283375.htm
*****http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f288


Contact

  • Bill Callahan
    iLawSuit
    858 602-2749
    Email