New Mirena IUD Lawsuit on Uterus Perforation: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

According to court documents, on April 12, a woman filed a lawsuit in the Morris County Civil Division alleging uterus perforation caused by her Mirena IUD. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Mirena IUD serious complications.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Mirena IUD: serious complications

Mirena IUD: serious complications

the plaintiff claims that a few months after the device was implanted, it migrated outside the uterus and she had to undergo laparoscopic surgery to remove it

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) June 13, 2013

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits and Mirena IUD Recall lawsuits

According to court documents, on April 12, a woman filed a lawsuit in the Morris County Civil Division (no. L1006-13) alleging uterus perforation caused by her Mirena IUD. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that a few months after the device was implanted, it migrated outside the uterus and she had to undergo laparoscopic surgery to remove it.

On May 2, a N.Y. resident filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (case no. 2:2013cv02422) alleging serious injuries caused by her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that a few months after the device was implanted, it migrated and was improperly located somewhere in the pelvis.

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in case of alleged Mirena IUD severe complications. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On April 8, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the centralization of federal lawsuits alleging injuries caused by Mirena IUD in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (MDL 2434). The cases in the Multidistrict Litigation allege that Mirena IUD may migrate away from its original position, perforate the uterus and/or cause related injuries.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/6/prweb10824526.htm