Thousands of Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stems were sold before these products were pulled from the market. In fact, more than 80 Stryker hip lawsuits have already been filed in a consolidated litigation established in New Jersey Superior Court.
New York, New York (PRWEB) March 21, 2013
Bernstein Liebhard LLP notes that a Brief has been filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) indicating that Defendants in Stryker hip replacement lawsuits have voiced support for the establishment of a multidistrict litigation in Minnesota for all federally-filed claims stemming from the July 2012 recall of Stryker Rejuvenate Modular Neck Hip Stems. (In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, Case Pending No. 20 (JPML)) However, according to the March 18th Brief, Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation, and Stryker Sales Corporation, declined to support the transfer of claims involving Stryker ABG II Modular-Neck Hip Stems to the proposed multidistrict litigation. According to the Defendants, no federal Stryker hip lawsuits have been filed over the ABG II components, though they were recalled as well.
“Thousands of Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stems were sold before these products were pulled from the market. In fact, more than 80 Stryker hip lawsuits have already been filed in a consolidated litigation established in New Jersey Superior Court earlier this year for claims stemming from this recall,” says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and medical devices, including clients who have filed Stryker hip replacement lawsuits. The Firm is currently offering free legal evaluations to alleged victims of Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stems. (In re Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Stem and the ABG II Modular Hip Stem Litigation, No. 296)
Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuits
The Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stems were recalled in July 2012, after data indicated the metal components were prone to fretting and corrosion at the modular-neck junction. Stryker is recommending that all patients fitted with the recalled components undergo metal ion testing and cross sectional imaging to ensure their hips are functioning properly, even if they are not experiencing symptoms of a failing hip implant. *
On February 19th, a Plaintiff in a federally-filed Stryker hip replacement lawsuit filed a motion with the JPML that sought transfer of all similar federal cases to the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota for pretrial proceeding. According to that petition, at least 30 Stryker Rejuvenate lawsuits had been filed since the recall in various federal jurisdictions. In their Response, Defendants said they agreed with the Plaintiff’s assertion that Minnesota is the most reasonable and suitable venue for the Stryker hip lawsuits, as 10 cases pending there were already being managed by Senior Judge Richard H. Kyle. (In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, Case Pending No. 20 (JPML))
At least 81 additional Stryker hip replacement lawsuits are pending in a consolidated litigation recently established in New Jersey’s Bergen County Superior Court. According to court records, that litigation’s second Case Management Conference was held yesterday, with the third scheduled for April 10th. (In re Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Stem and the ABG II Modular Hip Stem Litigation, No. 296)
Individuals who have suffered hip implant failures, metal poisoning, pain, or revision surgery allegedly due to the recalled Rejuvenate and ABG II components may be entitled to file a Stryker hip lawsuit to obtain compensation for their medical care, pain and suffering, and other damages. A wealth of information regarding Stryker hip replacement lawsuits is available at Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s website. Free lawsuit evaluations can be obtained by calling 877-779-1414.
About Bernstein Liebhard LLP
Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the “Plaintiffs’ Hot List,” recognizing the top plaintiffs’ firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2013 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, (212) 779-1414. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Felecia L. Stern, Esq.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP