Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation Moves Forward: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

Share Article

On August 16, a US Judge issued a Scheduling Order for the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) outlining a time-table for the selection of the first bellwether trials of the MDL. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Mirena IUD serious complications.

Mirena IUD: serious complications

Mirena IUD: serious complications

allege that Mirena IUD may migrate away from its original position, perforate the uterus and/or cause related injuries

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits.

On August 16, a US Judge issued a Scheduling Order for the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) outlining a time-table for the selection of the first bellwether trials of the MDL (No. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York). The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method. The cases in the MDL allege that Mirena IUD may migrate away from its original position, perforate the uterus and/or cause related injuries.

Court data updated on August 15, indicate that there are 123 actions currently pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation.

On August 9, a woman filed a lawsuit in New Jersey District Court (case no. 2:2013cv04795) alleging that she suffered physical, emotional and financial injury from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she was implanted with the Mirena IUD in 2011; a few months later she was forced to undergo surgical removal of the device and, after several unsuccessful efforts, the surgeon had to to remove the device along with the surrounding omentum.

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in case of alleged Mirena IUD severe complications. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason," he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On July 24, a Hardin County woman filed a lawsuit in Texas Eastern District Court (case no. 1:2013cv00472) alleging that Mirena IUD migrated into her abdominal cavity. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she was implanted with the Mirena IUD in 2006 and in 2010 a CT scan revealed that the device had perforated her uterus and migrated into her abdominal cavity.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/9/prweb11110260.htm

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Sean Burke
Visit website