the plaintiff claims that her Mirena IUD migrated and perforated her uterus; surgical removal of the device was required
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) September 20, 2013
AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits and potential Mirena IUD Class Action lawsuit.
On August 27, a North Carolina woman filed a lawsuit in Illinois Southern District Court (case no. 3:2013cv10796) alleging that she suffered serious complications from her Mirena IUD. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that her Mirena IUD migrated and perforated her uterus; surgical removal of the device was required.
On August 16, a US Judge issued a Scheduling Order for the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) outlining a time-table for the selection of the first bellwether trials of the MDL (No. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York). The cases in the MDL allege that Mirena IUD may migrate away from its original position, perforate the uterus and/or cause related injuries.
Court data updated on August 15, indicate that there are 123 actions currently pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation.
Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in case of alleged Mirena IUD severe complications. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”
On August 9, a woman filed a lawsuit in New Jersey District Court (case no. 2:2013cv04795) alleging that she suffered physical, emotional and financial injury from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she was implanted with the Mirena IUD in 2011; a few months later she was forced to undergo surgical removal of the device and, after several unsuccessful efforts, the surgeon had to to remove the device along with the surrounding omentum.
AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.
Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/9/prweb11138886.htm