New Mirena IUD Lawsuit Alleges Uterus Perforation: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

On January 2, a new lawsuit was filed by a young woman in Minnesota District Court (case no. 0:2014cv00003) alleging that her Mirena IUD perforated her uterus. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Mirena IUD serious complications.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Mirena IUD: serious complications

Mirena IUD: serious complications

According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had the device inserted in 2008 and, in 2012, it was diagnosed that Mirena IUD had perforated her uterus and was located near her bowels

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) January 27, 2014

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and now, can actively provide an expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits.

On January 2, a new lawsuit was filed by a young woman in Minnesota District Court (case no. 0:2014cv00003) alleging that her Mirena IUD perforated her uterus. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had the device inserted in 2008 and, in 2012, it was diagnosed that Mirena IUD had perforated her uterus and was located near her bowels.

Another lawsuit was filed on December 20, by a Sioux Falls woman in South Dakota District Court (case no. 4:2013cv04143) alleging serious complications from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that her Mirena IUD required surgical removal after lodging itself in her pelvic cavity.

According to court data updated on January 15, by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, there are 344 cases pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL no. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York).

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Mirena IUD. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason," he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On December 12, another lawsuit was filed by a woman in Missouri Western District Court (case no. 4:2013cv01201) alleging that she suffered severe complications from her Mirena IUD. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had the Mirena IUD inserted in 2008. A year later, she suffered pain and sonograms revealed that the device had migrated. After her doctor recommended surgical removal, the device was discovered on the left side of the abdomen just out of her pelvis.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/01/prweb11518531.htm