New Wright Profemur Lawsuit Alleges Defective Hip Implant: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

On January 28, a new lawsuit was filed by a couple in Arkansas Eastern District Court alleging that the husband received a Wright Profemur hip implant that failed. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Wright Hip Implant serious complications.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Wright Profemur Hip Replacement: serious complications

Wright Profemur Hip Replacement: serious complications

the plaintiff claims that the titanium-based femoral component of the hip implant failed because of defects

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) February 06, 2014

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and now, can actively provide an expert opinion in view of the recent news on Wright Profemur Hip Replacement Side Effects and lawsuits.

On January 28, a new lawsuit was filed by a couple in Arkansas Eastern District Court (case no. 3:2014cv00027) alleging that the husband received a Wright Profemur hip implant that failed. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that the titanium-based femoral component of the hip implant failed because of defects.

According to court documents, on October 11, a federal judge allowed certain claims to proceed in a Wright Profemur hip replacement lawsuit (Georgia Middle District Court, case no. 5:2012cv00173). More specifically, the plaintiff will be able to pursue design defect claim on both the hip implant and the extraction device, manufacturing defect claim on the extraction device, and failure to warn claim on the hip implant.

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Wright Profemur Hip Replacement. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Wright hip replacement lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On July 2, a man filed a lawsuit in Oregon District Court (case no. 3:2013cv01115) alleging his Wright hip implant fractured and required revision surgery. In the lawsuit ,the plaintiff claims that he was implanted with the Wright Profemur and Conserve hip implant devices in 2007 and in 2011 the hip implant fractured requiring emergency revision surgery to replace it.

A court order issued on March 20, indicates that a settlement has been reached in a Wright Profemur hip lawsuit (case no. 4:2011cv03086, California Northern District Court) alleging that the implant failed. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that he was implanted with the Wright Profemur Hip in 2006, and in 2010 the implant fractured leading to revision surgery.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Wright Hip lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/02/prweb11554723.htm