New Mirena IUD Product Liability Lawsuit: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

On December 31, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman in St. Clair County Circuit Court (case no. 13L641) alleging that the device has a tendency to migrate from its intended place. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Mirena IUD serious complications.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Mirena IUD: serious complications

Mirena IUD: serious complications

there are 344 cases pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) February 11, 2014

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and now, can actively provide an expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits and potential Mirena IUD Class Action lawsuit.

On December 31, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman in St. Clair County Circuit Court (case no. 13L641) alleging that the device has a tendency to migrate from its intended place. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method.

Another lawsuit was filed on January 2, by a young woman in Minnesota District Court (case no. 0:2014cv00003) alleging that her Mirena IUD perforated her uterus. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had the device inserted in 2008 and, in 2012, it was diagnosed that Mirena IUD had perforated her uterus and was located near her bowels.

According to court data updated on January 15, by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, there are 344 cases pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL no. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York).

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Mirena IUD. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

Another lawsuit was filed on December 20, by a Sioux Falls woman in South Dakota District Court (case no. 4:2013cv04143) alleging serious complications from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that her Mirena IUD required surgical removal after lodging itself in her pelvic cavity.

AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/02/prweb11562938.htm