(PRWEB) March 10, 2014
In Pennsylvania marital misconduct is a factor considered by the Courts in denying alimony or spousal support, but it does not limit a party’s ability to collect alimony pendente lite. Alimony pendente lite (“APL”) refers to court ordered payments from one spouse to the other spouse during the parties’ separation period and the pendency of the divorce and equitable distribution proceedings, whereas alimony refers a court ordered support payments from one former spouse to the other former spouse after their marriage has ended and a divorce decree has been entered.
APL is generally paid by the primary bread winner to a dependent spouse with less or no earnings and limited financial resources. Pennsylvania has a statute that allows for a court to grant APL, counsel fees and expenses to either spouse during the pendency of the action, but unlike the statute allowing for alimony, marital misconduct is not a factor that the courts may considered when awarding APL to a spouse.
Courts in Pennsylvania have consistently found that APL is not barred by martial misconduct, because the purpose of APL is to place spouses on equal economic footing during the divorce proceedings. In Schenk v. Schenk, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania stated, “APL is based on the need of one party to have equal financial resources to pursue a divorce proceeding when, in theory, the other party has major assets.”
If you would like to read more, please read the full article at: http://www.pozzuolofamilylaw.com
Contact our Philadelphia Family Law Firm with your questions, comments or concerns.
Pozzuolo Rodden, P.C. provides specialized cost-effective legal services to privately held business owners and high-net-worth clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey in excess of 35 years.
Practice Areas: Family Law/Litigation | Business/Corporate Litigation | Business/Corporate Law | Real Estate | Employment Law | Estate Planning | Tax & Pension Law
Pozzuolo Rodden, P.C.
Counselors at Law
2033 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103