the plaintiff claims that the titanium-based femoral component of the hip implant failed because of defects
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) March 14, 2014
AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and now, can actively provide an expert opinion in view of the recent news on Wright Profemur Hip Replacement Lawsuits.
On March 7, a Nova Scotia man was certified as lead plaintiff in a Class Action lawsuit on Wright Hip replacements (Case no. 355381, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia). According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff has his left hip replaced with the Wright Profemur hip in June 2007, as a result of osteoarthritis. In September 2009, he underwent revision surgery to his left hip as a result of the fracture of one component of the Wright Profemur hip replacement.
According to a Court Order issued on January 29, regarding a Wright Profemur hip implant lawsuit, the defendant's (Wright Medical) motion to strike and for an order to show cause was denied (case no. 4:2013cv00853, Missouri Eastern District Court). In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she was implanted with the Wright Profemur hip in 2008 and, in 2010, the device failed requiring surgical removal.
Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Wright Profemur Hip Replacement. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Wright hip replacement lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”
On January 28, a new lawsuit was filed by a couple in Arkansas Eastern District Court (case no. 3:2014cv00027) alleging that the husband received a Wright Profemur hip implant that failed. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that the titanium-based femoral component of the hip implant failed because of defects.
Court data, updated on March 13, by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, indicate that there are 77 cases currently pending in the Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2329, US District Court, Northern District of Georgia).
AttorneyOne.com has further information on Wright Hip lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.
Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/03/prweb11665713.htm