New Grafting Procedure for Oral Implantation

An innovative procedure, utilizing a single incision for access and localized antibiotics to treat infection, is being introduced that will enable immediate implantation with a bone graft harvested from a portion of the patient’s own lower jaw. A case study in the Journal of Oral Implantology provides an in-depth analysis of this new approach for immediate treatment and implantation of an infected area, which eliminates the delay that usually occurs when infection is present.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on PinterestEmail a friend
Figure 5. Tetracycline antibiotic application. Figure 6. Microbial sample for culture test, etc.

Figure 5. Tetracycline antibiotic application. Figure 6. Microbial sample for culture test, etc.

Despite the presence of infection, the patient was able receive a bone graft harvested from the symphysis of her mandible.

Lawrence, KS (PRWEB) May 02, 2014

Journal of Oral Implantology – A goal of current oral surgery is not merely to replace a problematic tooth, but also to keep the supporting tissue structure of the mouth and jawline intact. This helps in maintaining the long-term effectiveness of the surgery and the oral cavity and jawline esthetics. However, if infection is present, surgery is usually delayed which may compromise the supporting tissues.

An innovative procedure, utilizing a single incision for access and localized antibiotics to treat infection, is being introduced that will enable immediate implantation with a bone graft harvested from a portion of the patient’s own lower jaw. A case study in the Journal of Oral Implantology provides an in-depth analysis of this new approach for immediate treatment and implantation of an infected area.

In oral implant surgery, immediate implantation of the area of interest is preferred, as delaying the procedure can have a negative effect on the structure of hard and soft tissues. Frequently, required surgeries coincide with oral infection and surgeons prefer to wait until the infection is resolved before performing the reconstructive implant surgery. This time-lapse in placement of reconstructive bone grafts and the delayed implant placement may compromise the final esthetic result.

In the case study, a 43-year-old female presenting with a front-tooth infection of 7-months duration underwent a root canal and antibiotics. When symptoms persisted, tooth removal was recommended. Despite the presence of infection, the patient was able receive a bone graft harvested from the symphysis of her mandible. Application of localized antibiotics was used to treat the infection. Three years postoperatively, the patient presented with no negative effects.

Regarding recovery from oral surgery, immediate implantation is critical to:
(i) preserving the structure of the soft and hard tissue
(ii) shortening the recovery period
(iii) prevention of future corrective surgeries

Grafting procedures using bone from the patient’s own body has been the gold standard for years; therefore, it is a natural progression for oral implantation to follow suit.

Full text of the article, “3 Year Follow Up of a Single Immediate Implant Placed in an Infected Area: A Clinical Report of a Novel Approach for the Harvesting Autogenous Symphysis Graft,” Journal of Oral Implantology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2014, is available at http://www.joionline.org/doi/full/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00202.

###

About Journal of Oral Implantology

The Journal of Oral Implantology is the official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry. It is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. The JOI distinguishes itself as the first and oldest journal in the world devoted exclusively to implant dentistry. For more information about the journal or society, please visit: http://www.joionline.org/


Contact