Consumer Reports Survey Show 73 Percent Of Consumers Misled By ‘Natural’ Labels At The Grocery Store

Share Article

FDA comment period on ‘natural’ label requirement ends today; CR submits nearly 250,000 signatures demanding change

Given this overwhelming consumer confusion, the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) needs to act now to stop the misleading use of the ‘natural’ label.

A new survey released by Consumer Reports today shows that the majority of consumers—73 percent—seek out foods labeled as ‘natural’ when they make food-purchasing decisions. However, the term ‘natural’ on processed food labels has no clear meaning and is not regulated by any government agency. This is in contrast to 58 percent of consumers—15 percent less—who seek out the organic label, which is actually meaningful and backed by hundreds of pages of standards.

CR’s 2014 survey showed in contrast that 59 percent of consumers looked for the natural label and 49 percent looked for organic—highlighting the need for immediate government action to prevent consumers from being misled.

These new findings come on the heels of Consumer Reports’ March 2016 issue, which highlighted the finding from a 2015 CR survey that almost two-thirds of shoppers believe the natural label means more than it does, and nearly half incorrectly believe that natural claims on labels have been independently verified. According to this survey and a 2014 survey, the majority of consumers expect processed foods labeled ‘natural’ to contain no artificial ingredients or processing aids, no toxic pesticides or no GMOs.

Yet none of these expectations are true.

“Given this overwhelming consumer confusion, the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) needs to act now to stop the misleading use of the ‘natural’ label,” said Urvashi Rangan, Ph.D., director of the Consumer Reports Food Safety & Sustainability Center. “Ideally, the word should be banned from food packaging. If the agency does not ban, it should establish a highly meaningful standard that is in line with consumer expectations for ‘natural’ foods—that they be produced according to the government’s standards for organic food and that they do not contain artificial ingredients. And any claim should be independently verified to ensure it is true.”

Consumer Reports first petitioned the FDA in 2014 to ban the word ‘natural’ on food labels, and continues to urge the agency to take action to avoid misleading consumers. In response, the FDA asked the public to weigh in on what the term should mean in food labeling. With the public comment period ending today, CR submitted a detailed petition with nearly 250,000 comments and a letter signed by 19 organizations, demanding that the FDA ban or establish meaningful standards for the term in food labeling. Other organizations signing onto the initiative include Food and Water Watch and National Consumers League.

The new CR survey, conducted in February 2016, shows that the majority of consumers look to labels and ingredient lists to make their everyday food-purchasing decisions. But ‘natural’ foods are not the only issue facing consumers. Consumer Reports’ survey found discrepancies between consumer expectations and reality when it comes to food safety, genetically engineered foods, and more.

The survey found that 77 percent of consumers mistakenly believe that the FDA evaluates or determines the safety of food ingredients and 66 percent mistakenly believe that the FDA keeps track of new ingredients introduced on the food market. But in fact, the FDA regulation called GRAS (generally recognized as safe) does not provide these important safeguards, and companies can deem new ingredients to be safe and use them without notifying the FDA. Consumer Reports is calling on the FDA to do more to review and track the safety of ingredients in our food.

The survey also showed that 86 percent of consumers believe that genetically engineered foods should be labeled before being sold. The FDA veterinary committee recently approved genetically engineered salmon, 53 percent of consumers say they will be less likely to buy any salmon if they can’t tell which salmon is genetically engineered. Consumer Reports continues to call for all genetically engineered or modified food to be clearly labeled.

“Our survey shows that the FDA is letting consumers down in important areas around food production and labeling,” said Rangan. “Consumers need to feel confident in the food that they buy, prepare, and feed to their families. The FDA must do more to ensure the food on grocery store shelves holds up to consumer expectations.”

Read the full Consumer Reports 2016 Food Label Survey here.

Read Consumer Reports’ March 2016 report on misleading ‘natural’ foods here.
About Consumer Reports
Consumer Reports is the world’s largest and most trusted nonprofit, consumer organization working to improve the lives of consumers by driving marketplace change. Founded in 1936, Consumer Reports has achieved substantial gains for consumers on health reform, food and product safety, financial reform, and other issues. The organization has advanced important policies to cut hospital-acquired infections, prohibit predatory lending practices and combat dangerous toxins in food. Consumer Reports tests and rates thousands of products and services in its 50-plus labs, state-of-the-art auto test center and consumer research center. Consumers Union, a division of Consumer Reports, works for pro-consumer laws and regulations in Washington, D.C., the states, and in the marketplace. With more than eight million subscribers to its flagship magazine, website and other publications, Consumer Reports accepts no advertising, payment or other support from the companies whose products it evaluates.
MAY 2016
© 2016 Consumer Reports. The material above is intended for legitimate news entities only; it may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. Consumer Reports® is an expert, independent nonprofit organization whose mission is to work for a fair, just, and safe marketplace for all consumers and to empower consumers to protect themselves. We accept no advertising and pay for all the products we test. We are not beholden to any commercial interest. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports®,® and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants. Our Ratings and reports are intended solely for the use of our readers. Neither the Ratings nor the reports may be used in advertising or for any other commercial purpose without our permission. Consumer Reports will take all steps open to it to prevent commercial use of its materials, its name, or the name of Consumer Reports®.

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

Douglas Love