Mirena Lawsuit News: Court Establishes Requirements for Plaintiff Fact Sheets in New Jersey Mirena Litigation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

The Firm is representing numerous clients in Mirena IUD lawsuits that have been filed in the New Jersey proceeding.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friendRepost This
Free Case Review
Our Firm is pleased to see this proceeding moving forward, as we are representing numerous Mirena lawsuit clients whose claims are pending in this litigation.

New York, NY (PRWEB) April 22, 2014

Mirena lawsuits (http://www.themirenalawsuitcenter.com) continue to move forward in a multicounty litigation now underway in New Jersey’s Bergen County Superior Court, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to an Order dated on April 11, 2014, the Court has established core criteria for the completion of Plaintiff Fact Sheets, which are required to be submitted by all plaintiffs who have filed Mirena IUD lawsuits in the proceeding. Among other things, the Court has stipulated that defendants will be permitted to issue a Deficiency Letter to any plaintiff who fails to answer one or more of the core criteria questions specified by the Order. If the plaintiff fails to provide the required answers within 30 days of the issuance of that letter, their claim may be subject to dismissal. (In Re: Mirena Litigation; Case No. 297)

“Our Firm is pleased to see this proceeding moving forward, as we are representing numerous Mirena lawsuit clients whose claims are pending in this litigation,” says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm is currently offering free Mirena lawsuit evaluations to women who may have been injured due to the spontaneous migration of their IUD.

Mirena IUD Lawsuits
According to court documents, more than 700 lawsuits have been filed in Bergen County Superior Court on behalf of women who allegedly suffered serious Mirena side effects, including uterine perforations, infections, scarring, and infertility, due to spontaneous migration of their IUD. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals failed to provide adequate warnings regarding the propensity of the Mirena IUD to spontaneously migrate from its proper position in the uterus, and point out that the Mirena label only states that migration may occur if the uterus is punctured during insertion. All of the women who have filed Mirena IUD lawsuits in this proceeding allege that their IUD was correctly inserted by their doctor, and that the migration they experienced was not the result of improper placement.

In addition to the New Jersey litigation, nearly 500 additional Mirena lawsuits that raise similar allegations regarding spontaneous IUD migration have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. (In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

The Mirena IUD is a long-acting birth control method that was approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000. In 2009, the agency expanded its approved uses to include the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women who wish to use an IUD as their method of contraception. That same year, the FDA issued a Warning Letter to Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals after finding that one of the company’s Mirena promotions made misleading claims about the safety and efficacy of the IUD.

According to a report that aired on 7 Action News this past summer, the FDA has received more than 70,000 complaints involving Mirena side effects, including thousands that detail cases of device dislocation and uterine perforation, since the IUD was first brought to market in 2000.*

Alleged victims of Mirena side effects associated with spontaneous device migration may be eligible to file their own Mirena IUD lawsuit. To learn more about the ongoing Mirena litigation, visit Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s website, or the Firm’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/mirenalawsuithelp. For a free legal consultation, please call 800-511-5092.

*wxyz.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-women-complain-about-dangerous-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-control, 7 Action News, August 27, 2013

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP
Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs’ Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the country, for the past 12 consecutive years. Bernstein Liebhard LLP is the only firm in the country to be named to this prestigious list every year since the list was first published in 2003.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016
800-511-5092

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2014 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, 800-511-5092. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Contact Information:

Felecia L. Stern, Esq.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
info (at) consumerinjurylawyers (dot) com
http://www.themirenalawsuitcenter.com
https://plus.google.com/115936073311125306742?rel=author