Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Federal Judge Denies Summary Judgment in Boston Scientific Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

The Firm is representing hundreds of women who have suffered serous vaginal mesh complications, allegedly due to pelvic mesh products manufactured by Boston Scientific Corp. and others.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Free Case Review
We are representing a number of women who have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits against Boston Scientific in this proceeding that involve allegations similar to those put forth by the Plaintiff in this case.

New York, New York (PRWEB) January 21, 2014

Thousands of transvaginal mesh lawsuits (http://www.transvaginalmeshlawsuithelp.com/)
filed against Boston Scientific Corp. continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to an Order dated January 17, 2014, the judge overseeing the proceeding has denied a request by Boston Scientific Corp. for a summary judgment in a case filed by a woman who received the Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit and Advantage Transvaginal Mid-Urethal Sling System. In seeking the summary judgment, the company had argued that the vaginal mesh lawsuit is time-barred by California’s two-year statute of limitations because the Plaintiff had discovered the cause of her injuries more than two years before her claim was filed. However, U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin found that there was an issue of fact as to whether she could have discovered a connection between her vaginal mesh complications and her implant within that time frame. (Sanchez v. Boston Scientific Corp., No. 2:12-576)

“We are representing a number of women who have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits against Boston Scientific in this proceeding that involve allegations similar to those put forth by the Plaintiff in this case,” says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm is currently representing hundreds of women who suffered mesh erosion, pain, scarring, infection and other serious injuries, allegedly due to transvaginal mesh products marketed by a number of manufacturers. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in the federal Boston Scientific litigation.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits
According to court documents, Boston Scientific is named a defendant in more than 8,600 vaginal mesh lawsuits now pending in the Southern District of West Virginia. All of the complaints claim that use of the company’s pelvic mesh products in surgeries to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence caused plaintiffs to suffer serious and debilitating injuries. The lawsuits further allege that that the company failed to provide adequate warnings to patients and doctors regarding the risk of serious vaginal mesh complications associated with its products. Court documents indicate that the first bellwether trial in the federal Boston Scientific litigation is scheduled to begin on March 10, 2014. (In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation - MDL No. 2326)

Boston Scientific is just one of several pelvic mesh manufacturers involved in litigations now underway in the Southern District of West Virginia. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is also serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committees for proceedings involving American Medical Systems, Inc. (MDL No. 2325), C.R. Bard, Inc. (MDL 2326) and Ethicon, Inc. (MDL No. 2327). According to court documents, at least 40,000 claims have been filed in the seven proceedings pending in the jurisdiction.

Mr. Grand was also named Co-Liaison Counsel in two consolidated proceedings established for C.R. Bard and Ethicon mesh lawsuits in New Jersey’s Atlantic Superior Court. He was also a member of the trial team on the first Ethicon trial, which ended in March with an $11 million verdict for the Plaintiff. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-10; In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-10).

Women who were allegedly injured by transvaginal mesh may be entitled to file their own vaginal mesh lawsuit. To learn more about the complications that may be associated with these products, please visit Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s website, or the Firm’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/meshlawsuit. To obtain a free, confidential and no-obligation case review, please call 800-511-5092.

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP
Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the “Plaintiffs’ Hot List,” recognizing the top plaintiffs’ firms in the country, for the past 11 consecutive years.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016
800-511-5092

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2014 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, 800-511-5092. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

Contact Information:
Felecia L. Stern, Esq.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
info(at)consumerinjurylawyers(dot)com
http://www.transvaginalmeshlawsuithelp.com/
https://plus.google.com/115936073311125306742?rel=author