Federal Judge Orders Review of C.R. Bard Avaulta Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits, Rottenstein Law Group LLP Reports

The firm is currently offering transvaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations for those who allege they sustained injuries from their vaginal mesh implants designed to treat vaginal prolapse in women.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
The firm is currently offering transvaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations for those who allege they sustained injuries from their vaginal mesh implants designed to treat vaginal prolapse in women.

The firm is currently offering transvaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations for those who allege they sustained injuries from their vaginal mesh implants designed to treat vaginal prolapse in women.

Multidistrict litigations are the consolidation of closely related lawsuits for pretrial efficiency.

(PRWEB) January 08, 2014

A federal court judge in West Virginia recently ordered a census of existing C.R. Bard Avaulta mesh lawsuits in his court, according to the Dec. 31, 2013, court order. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, which maintains a vaginal mesh lawsuits website at http://www.vaginalmeshlawsuitcenter.net and represents clients in mesh lawsuits, explains the news.

Bard Avaulta lawsuits make up about 6,000 of the more than 40,000 vaginal mesh lawsuits pending in federal court in West Virginia before Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, according to court documents (In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation; MDL-2187, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). Goodwin’s order cited the sheer size of the multidistrict litigation as among the needs to periodically take an accounting of the body of suits.

“Multidistrict litigations are the consolidation of closely related lawsuits for pretrial efficiency,” said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. “A census can help ensure that the pretrial proceedings run as smoothly as possible.”

Women are filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits alleging they suffered injuries from serious adverse side effects such as pain, discomfort and the erosion of the mesh implant, according to court documents.

At least two Bard bellwether trials had outcomes in which the plaintiff received compensation. In the first, on Aug. 15, 2013, a jury awarded plaintiff Donna Cisson about $2 million in damages, according to court documents (Cisson v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:11-cv-00195; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). In the second trial, which occurred in the same month, plaintiff Wanda Queen settled out of court for an undisclosed sum, according to court documents (Queen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:11-cv-00012; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia).

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages women who believe they have suffered from the alleged side effects of their transvaginal mesh implants to visit the firm's FAQ page for quick answers to questions about lawsuits, settlements and side effects. For updates on lawsuit news, visit RLG's transvaginal mesh Facebook page.

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP
The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-based firm that represents clients nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent clients hurt by defective medical devices and medications. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.)

Contact:
The Rottenstein Law Group LLP
Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.
321 W. 44th Street
# 804
New York NY 10036
(212) 933-9500 (office phone)
(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)
rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com
plus.google.com/106070664376281033016

###