Judge Denies Merck’s Attempt to Wipe Out a $285,000 Fosamax Verdict: Now, AttorneyOne Can Provide Advice

According to court documents, on July 1st, a US Federal judge denied Merck’s attempt to wipe out a $285,000 plaintiff verdict on Fosamax jaw deterioration. In light of this news, AttorneyOne, a recognized authority on law, informs that they are now providing advice, including how to get in contact with legal counsel, to people potentially affected by Fosamax side effects.

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend
Fosamax: serious adverse events

Fosamax: serious adverse events

the plaintiff claims that she took Fosamax from 2000 to 2006 and, as a result, she suffers severe and permanent personal injuries to the jaw bone, including osteonecrosis of the jaw

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) July 05, 2013

AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Fosamax and ONJ lawsuits.

According to court documents, on July 1st, a US Federal judge denied Merck’s attempt to wipe out a $285,000 plaintiff verdict on Fosamax jaw deterioration (case no. 1:08-cv-04119, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York). Fosamax, manufactured by Merck, belongs to the class of drugs known as bisphosphonates. It was approved by the FDA in 1995 and developed to treat post-menopausal osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone. In the lawsuit the plaintiff claims that she took Fosamax from 2000 to 2006 and, as a result, she suffers severe and permanent personal injuries to the jaw bone, including osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Court data, updated on May 15, indicate that there were 1,064 cases pending in the Fosamax Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2243, US District Court, New Jersey).

Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in case of alleged Fosamax severe complications. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Fosamax lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”

On April 5, a Pennsylvania woman filed a lawsuit in St. Clair County Circuit Court (case no. 13-L-185) alleging that the makers of Fosamax made exaggerated claims of the drug’s benefits. In the lawsuit the plaintiff claims that Fosamax weakened her bones, increasing the risk of injury.

Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/7/prweb10899770.htm


Contact

  • Sean Burke
    Attorney One
    1-877-230-7343
    Email