San Diego, CA (PRWEB) February 24, 2014
AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and now, can actively provide an expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena lawsuits and potential Mirena IUD Recall lawsuit.
According to court documents, the next Case Management Conference in the Mirena IUD Litigation is scheduled for February 25 (No. BER-L- 4098-13 MCL, Superior Court of New Jersey). Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method.
Court data updated on February 19, by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, indicate that there are 408 cases pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL no. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York).
On February 10, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (case no. 2:2014cv00844) alleging that she became pregnant while on the Mirena IUD. The In the lawsuit the plaintiff claims that, a few months after insertion, an ultrasound confirmed that the device had migrated and was located in the vescio-uterine wall just posterior to the bladder and anterior to the uterus.
Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Mirena IUD. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason", he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”
On December 31, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman in St. Clair County Circuit Court (case no. 13L641) alleging that the device has a tendency to migrate from its intended place.
Another lawsuit was filed on January 2, by a young woman in Minnesota District Court (case no. 0:2014cv00003) alleging that her Mirena IUD perforated her uterus. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had the device inserted in 2008 and, in 2012, it was diagnosed that Mirena IUD had perforated her uterus and was located near her bowels.
AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.
Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/02/prweb11604303.htm