the plaintiff claims that she suffered severe side effects and multiple surgical procedures were needed
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) December 05, 2013
AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, updated the website recently and they are now actively providing expert opinion in view of the recent news on Mirena IUD lawsuits and potential Mirena IUD Class Action lawsuit.
On November 12, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman in South Carolina District Court (case no. 7:2013cv03069) alleging serious injuries from her Mirena IUD. The Mirena IUD, manufactured by Bayer, is an intrauterine device (IUD) that is inserted into the uterus as a contraceptive method. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she suffered severe side effects and multiple surgical procedures were needed.
Another lawsuit was filed on November 1, by a woman in Pennsylvania Western District Court (2:2013cv01583) alleging that she suffered injuries from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that she was implanted with the Mirena IUD in 2010 and after the procedure she experienced complications. According to the lawsuit, in 2011, it was revealed that the device had migrated and perforated her uterus, requiring surgical removal.
According to court data updated on November 18, there were 267 cases pending in the Mirena IUD Multidistrict Litigation (MDL no. 2434, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York).
Taking into consideration the latest developments, AttorneyOne.com updated the website and, now, can actively provide an expert opinion including how to get in contact with legal counsel easily and inexpensively in cases of severe complications, allegedly from Mirena IUD. Sean Burke, director of Media Relations at AttorneyOne.com, adds that the relevant information illustrates that people continue to file Mirena IUD lawsuits. "For that reason," he continues, "our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”
On October 1, a New York woman filed a lawsuit in Illinois Northern District Court (case no. 1:2013cv07058) alleging that she suffered serious complications from her Mirena IUD. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff claims that her Mirena IUD migrated, perforated her uterus and laparoscopic surgery was required to remove it.
AttorneyOne.com has further information on Mirena IUD lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.
Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/12/prweb10456221.htm