Access to air travel, which is totally dependent on petroleum fuels, would have to be severely limited
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (PRWEB) June 25, 2015
According to the Friends of Science Society's report analysis by energy economist Robert Lyman “Climate Change Targets for Canada – Examining the Implications” the reality of implementing climate change emissions reductions would be very grim. Canadians are renowned as ‘snowbirds’ for their common habit of vacationing in warmer climates like Mexico, Arizona and Hawaii in winter months. The loss of some 500,000 ‘snowbirds’ would decimate these economies too.
“Access to air travel, which is totally dependent on petroleum fuels, would have to be severely limited,” says Lyman, retired economist and federal public servant who spent much of his career working on energy, transportation and environment issues.
Lyman's assessment is further confirmed by a new Troy Media article published June 22, 2015 that he wrote for Friends of Science entitled "What signing the climate change targets will mean for you: A heart-to-heart conversation with Canadians."
However, few people would have the money to fly anyway, as Lyman points out that most major industries in Canada would have to be completely shut down in order to reach the emissions reduction targets, leaving millions of Canadians unemployed.
During the meeting of the G7 industrialized countries in June 2015, the group agreed to a “common vision” of supporting the upper end of the latest IPCC recommendation of 40 to 70% reductions by 2050 compared to 2010 recognizing that this challenge can only be met by a global response, as reported in the Wall Street Journal on June 8th, 2015.
However, Lyman points out that would mean reducing emissions by at least 495 megatons, more if Canada's economy grows at a normal pace. That is equivalent, in today's terms, to eliminating all oil, gas and coal production; ceasing all transportation by cars, trucks, aircraft and ships; eliminating all use of coal and natural gas for electricity generation; and shutting down a significant portion of Canada's energy-intensive industries like vehicle manufacturing, cement, pulp and paper, mining and metal fabrication. Reducing emissions this much would cripple the overall economy, while doing virtually nothing to ‘save the planet’ since the growth of emissions in non-OECD countries would continue to grow by leaps and bounds, as shown in the graphs of Figures 140 and 142 of the US EIA 2013 Energy Forecast Report [Forecast link: eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).pdf]. In fact, if every industrialized country cut emissions by 70%, and the developing countries like China and India continued on their current path, the global emissions would still be higher in 2050 than they are today.
“Reaching these emissions targets would shrink Canada's 'carbon footprint', relative to its economy and population, to levels today seen only in poverty-stricken countries like Haiti, Afghanistan, North Korea and Chad,” says Lyman. “It is difficult to imagine how an energy-hungry, highly developed country whose population is constantly growing through immigration could realistically cut emissions so drastically in so short a time.”
Friends of Science Society recently hosted a distinguished speaker, Dr. Nir Shaviv, whose research shows how the sun drives climate change. Stringent targets may not be necessary.
Friends of Science have spent a decade reviewing a broad spectrum of literature on climate change and have concluded the sun is the main driver of climate change, not carbon dioxide (CO2). The core group of the Friends of Science is a growing group of earth, atmospheric and solar scientists, engineers and citizens.
Friends of Science Society
P.O. Box 23167, Mission P.O.
Canada T2S 3B1
Toll-free Telephone: 1-888-789-9597