New analysis quantifies the risk of acting on social media stock and ETF suggestions, highlighting misinformation trends and missing risk guidance
LONDON, Feb. 5, 2026 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- DayTrading.com today published original research showing that the majority of popular trading calls shared on X (formerly Twitter) fail basic accuracy and risk standards and historically deliver losses for traders who act on them.
The full report, "Viral Investing Tweets: 61% of Trade Calls Result in Losses" is available at: https://www.daytrading.com/about-us/media/x.
The study tracked 50 of the most widely circulated trading posts on the platform in January 2026, scoring each one for verifiability, outcome accuracy, and risk disclosure.
"Our goal at DayTrading.com was to move beyond anecdote and measure how frequently these posts actually lead to losing positions when evaluated objectively in real time," said the report's lead author, Christian Harris. "The data shows that confidence and likes don't translate to profitable or reliable trade ideas."
Key Findings From the DayTrading.com Viral Trading Analysis
DayTrading.com tracked and evaluated 50 viral trading suggestions involving US stocks and major index ETFs, focusing on posts that made clear directional claims and garnered significant engagement. The analysis revealed:
- 61% average loss rate across all tracked posts, showing most viral calls lost value within the same session they were posted.
- 68% loss rate for posts that lacked a clear stop-loss or invalidation level—the most common information gap identified.
- 42% of posts failed to include any defined stop or invalidation level, a striking omission given risk management's importance.
- Posts offering targets without entry context lost 64% of the time, indicating structure matters more than surface appeal.
- Even the "best" category of trading calls—those with clearer structures— still lost 55% of the time, underscoring the risk inherent in simple social media trade posts.
"Many of these suggestions look confident or persuasive at first glance," Harris notes, "but without clear entry, risk levels, and timeframes, there's no robust way to evaluate them later or manage downside."
Full methodology and scoring criteria are detailed in the report: https://www.daytrading.com/about-us/media/x.
Implications for Retail Traders
The DayTrading.com study highlights how engagement metrics—likes, shares, and comments—can obscure the actual quality and verifiability of trading information on social media.
Risk disclosure was especially weak, with many posts offering bold directional language but little to no guidance on when the idea might be invalid or harmful to act on.
Retail traders can use these findings to add empirical context to broader conversations about trading culture on social media and the potential harm of misinformation when influential posts reach large audiences without accountability.
How Traders Can Protect Themselves
Based on the findings, DayTrading.com suggests a simple framework for evaluating viral trading posts:
- Is there a specific price level that can be verified later?
- Is there a clear timeframe for the trade idea?
- Is it explained what invalidates the trade if it goes wrong?
If any of these elements are missing, DayTrading.com notes that the post is likely designed to drive engagement rather than support disciplined decision-making.
Source: https://www.daytrading.com/about-us/media/x
About DayTrading.com
DayTrading.com is a leading educational platform dedicated to active trading, providing independent reviews, broker comparisons, market guides, and data-driven research to help traders make informed decisions. To learn more, visit https://www.daytrading.com.
Media Contact
James Barra
DayTrading.com
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://www.daytrading.com
Media Contact
James Barra, DayTrading.com, 44 07757 949781, [email protected], https://www.daytrading.com/
SOURCE DayTrading.com
Share this article