NHP Foundation Survey: 44% of Americans Forced Into “Financial Cohabitation”

Share Article

Respondents living together to primarily afford rent report mental stress, depression, physical and emotional abuse

“Experts agree, access to affordable, resilient housing will ensure that people can afford to live with those they choose rather than by what their finances dictate,” according to Richard F. Burns, President & CEO of NHPF.

A recent survey finds that many low to middle income Americans move in together out of financial need rather than personal choice, often inflicting an emotional and physical toll. When asked “are you or a friend or family member currently in a co-living arrangement mainly for financial reasons?” 44% of those surveyed replied “yes.”

The NHP Foundation (NHPF), a not-for-profit provider of affordable housing, asked 500 people to describe these types of living arrangements and what, if any, hardships are associated with them.

The highest percentage (52%) of those reporting a financially driven co-living situation are individuals with a total household income of less than $50,000 a year (described by The Pew Research Center as “lower-income household”), and 50% of that group entered into such situations less than two years ago.

Of those queried, 51% were male and 41% female (non-binary individuals and those preferring not to say totaled less than 3% of respondents) Over half (51%) were aged 18-34, with nearly 40% aged between 35-54. Regionally, the highest percentage (65%) of those living together mainly for financial reasons reside in the West region (those states west of Texas). 54% can’t afford rent.

When asked which factors most contributed to a financially motivated co-living arrangement, highlights included:

  •     (54%) Inability to afford to pay rent independently
  •     (48%) Job loss
  •     (40%) Circumstances caused by Covid-19
  •     (35%) Shortage of available housing

According to Freddie Mac, as of the fourth quarter of 2020, the U.S. had a housing supply deficit of 3.8 million units, and in 2019, 32% of all households were “housing cost burdened,” spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Nearly one out of every five people in financially driven housing arrangements reports emotional and/or physical abuse.

While nearly one-third (29%) of those queried consider their situation “very positive” and another third as “somewhat positive”, the final third considers their living situation “neutral to negative,” with disturbing consequences and implications. Respondents believe that financially forced living situations result in unequal sharing of responsibilities (47%), jealousy (37%), mental stress (42%), depression (37%) and most concerning of all, physical and emotional abuse (19%).

Data from the National Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice (NCCCJ) reveals that the number of domestic violence incidents in the US increased by 8.1% after lockdown orders.
What can be done to alleviate the need to live together for financial reasons and to help those currently in such a situation?

When asked how helpful landlords, resident services providers, or management companies could be in alleviating the negative impacts of such living arrangements, over 60% of those queried rank onsite or nearby services most highly (“extremely/very helpful”) including childcare, mental health counseling, and financial and/or employment counseling.”

Overall, residents in service-enriched affordable housing (permanent rental housing in which social services are available onsite or by referral through a supportive services program or resident services coordinator) experience gains in areas such as financial literacy, academic achievement, job retention and more.

Survey respondents were also asked to rank government programs by helpfulness. The highest ranking (“extremely/very helpful”) government actions to alleviate the need for financially motivated co-living relationships include:

  •     (65%) Automatic financial aid at the outset of a crisis (financial, natural disaster, Pandemic)
  •     (65%) Increased affordable housing (specifically housing which is more resilient – built to withstand financial, natural, and medical crises)
  •     (60%) Zoning changes that create more affordable housing options

“Experts agree, access to affordable, resilient housing will ensure that people can afford to live with those they choose rather than by what their finances dictate,” according to Richard F. Burns, President & CEO of NHPF.

7 Strategies to Increase Access to Affordable Housing
The high price of rent and cost-burdened home ownership are current national woes: the Pandemic, job loss, racial and social inequity, and crushing student debt add to the adversity that is currently forcing some into financial cohabitation, changing relationship dynamics in often unhealthful ways. To that end, NHPF has developed seven strategies to ensure individuals and families can attain and maintain affordable housing.

1.    Foster Creation/Expansion of Automatic Stabilizers for the Housing Market

  •     Make the Tax Credit Exchange Program permanent to facilitate the exchange or return of unused tax credits for cash grants in the event the LIHTC market should bottom out, as occurs during severe economic downturns.
  •     Automatically increase housing voucher allocations when unemployment rates cross a certain threshold, injecting much needed capital into affordable housing markets while supporting residents in a timely fashion.
  •     Tailor these automatic stabilizers to fit the needs of all stakeholders while side-stepping the often arduous congressional approvals needed for fresh legislation to address individual crises.

2.    Make Local, Flexible Policy Shifts to Enable Production and Preservation

  •     Change zoning density limits enabling multifamily properties.
  •     Increase accessory dwelling units on existing single-family lots
  •     Generate local affordable housing funds to augment state and federal resources for the purpose of developing or preserving affordable rental housing.
  •     Address market differences. Explore raising income thresholds for eligibility in some high-cost markets, as even many moderate-income households find themselves housing cost-burdened.

3.    Redouble Efforts to Assist All Underserved Populations

  •     Increase funding for voucher-based programs benefiting residents with low incomes
  •     Revisit income thresholds for various affordability programs

4.    Enhance Capital Support

  •     Lobby for increased funding of LIHTC, the Capital Magnet Fund, National Housing Trust Fund and other programs that facilitate development and preservation of more affordable rental units.
  •     Seek ways to “bake in” funding for critical onsite resident services.

5.    Break Down Barriers to Increase Collaborative Efforts

  •     Deepen subsidies for developments to be both affordable and economically viable.
  •     Encourage public, philanthropic and private sector to increase their financial roles.
  •     Tweak regulations to enable programs to augment each other in a relatively seamless way.
  •     Revisit regulations to make them more consistent across programs. Aligning program rules can make it easier for private-sector actors to work in partnership with the public sector producing greater impacts.

6.    Be open to bold, new funding ideas

  •     Consider cryptocurrency. Miami introduced its local cryptocurrency, Miami Coin, which “in under 60 days, generated about $7.5M for the city and can be used for affordable housing.”
  •     Look to other countries. Learn from policies which support stable, affordable rental housing. In these case studies on rental housing specifically in six developed countries, the U.S. stands out as “having spent the least amount of GDP on housing compared to other rich countries.”

7.    Capitalize on a Readiness to Address Racial Inequity

  •     Pursue policies and programs at all levels of government to reverse decades of redlining, home appraisal discrimination, and unequal access to quality housing.
  •     Invest in long under-served populations and places. Among other things, there is a consensus recommendation for strong enforcement and potential expansion of anti-discrimination legislation such as the Fair Housing Act and the Community Reinvestment Act.

About the NHP Foundation
Headquartered in New York City with offices in Washington, DC, and Chicago, IL, The NHP Foundation (NHPF) was launched on January 30, 1989, as a publicly supported 501(c)(3) not-for-profit real estate corporation. Since that time NHPF has invested nearly $1.2 billion in the preservation of affordable housing throughout 15 states and the District of Columbia. The investing of these funds has resulted in economic stability for thousands of seniors, families, and children. Communities have been enriched, school systems have remained intact, local businesses sustained their patrons and residents retained their employment. Through Family-Centered Coaching, NHPF’s subsidiary Operation Pathways engages with, and assists, families experiencing poverty and other hardship, to problem-solve together. Through partnerships with major financial institutions, the public sector, faith-based initiatives, and other not-for-profit organizations, NHPF has 57 properties, including more than 10,000 units. For more information, please visit http://www.nhpfoundation.org.

Share article on social media or email:

View article via:

Pdf Print

Contact Author

marijane funess
Visit website