The DC Circuit is Asked to Change Court for the Appeal Against 8 US Supreme Court Justices Who Were Dismissed Sua Sponte When Default Requests Were Pending for 2.5 Months

In the appeal (Case No. 19-5014) from Judge Rudolph Contreras's Order dismissing 67 defendants sua sponte, including 8 Justices of the US Supreme Court who were pending default, California Attorney Yi Tai Shao filed a motion to change court based on two grounds, specifically pursuant to the letter order of Chief Justice John G. Roberts of October 10, 2018 (in removing complaints against Justice Bret Kavanaugh from the DC Circuit) when three Justices including Chief Justice Roberts are alumni judges of the DC Circuit. Judge Patricia Millet, who succeeded the seat of Chief Justice, denied the motion on July 31, 2019 without addressing either ground of disqualification. Millet further granted dismissal of American Inns of Court, denied Shao's motion for summary reversal without stating a ground, and issued an order to show cause to dismissal all defendants. On August 24, 2019, Shao filed Petition for Rehearing asking to vacate Millet's denial of recusal and other orders and moved to change venue.

News provided by

Shao Law Firm, PC

Aug 29, 2019, 22:10 ET


WASHINGTON, Aug. 29, 2019 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- On May 21, 2018, California lawyer Yi Tai Shao filed with the District Court for the District of Columbia a historical lawsuit against 67 defendants, including seeking a declarative relief to impeach eight Justices at the US Supreme Court (Chief Justice John G. Roberts, and Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Stephen Beyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor), Judge J. Clifford Wallace at the 9th Circuit, Judge Lucy Koh and Judge Edward Davila at the District in San Jose, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, 5 Justices at the Sixth District Court of Appeal of California and 5 judges at Santa Clara County Court in California who are related to Shao's prior attorney James McManis as being his client or close and regular social contacts through the American Inns of Court.

Shao sued for a declarative relief of impeachment against the US Supreme Court Justices alleging that they did not perform their Constitutional duty to adjudicate her requests for recusal in Petitions No. 17-256, 17-613, 18-344, 18-569 and 18-800. Shao sued the US Supreme Court alleging its alteration of the court's records and dockets, including removing from the court's website all documentary evidence of conflicts of interest supporting her requests for recusal. (See the US Supreme Court's site, enter the case number, then click on Request for Recusal, go to the last page.) According to the court's records, these recusal motions were based on Shao's allegations of the Supreme Court Justices' close social relationship with James McManis through the American Inns of Court, including their receiving undisclosed financial interest through the Temple Bar Scholarship which has been published on the website of the American Inns of Court including substantial value of gift and a "stipend".

On August 24, 2019, SHAO filed Petition for Rehearing asking to vacate the July 31, 2019's order and change court of this appeal.

Attorney Yi Tai Shao owns Shao Law Firm, P.C. and has practiced litigation in California since 1996. Attorney Shao obtained LL.B. degree from National Taiwan University, J.D. degree from University of Iowa,and in 2016, a LL.M. degree from Washington University at St. Louis (GPA 3.80). She has sought judicial relief from her alleged judiciary abduction of her child for 9 years since the time her child was 5 years old, facing major issues of the courts' conflicts of interest from Santa Clara County Court in California to the US Supreme Court.

SOURCE Shao Law Firm, PC