Salt Lake City, UT (PRWEB) August 25, 2017 -- Diana J. Huntsman, a founding attorney of Huntsman | Lofgran, PLLC, recently won a case stemming from alleged police misconduct and unreasonable seizure (Case No. 15-4020, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit).
According to court documents, in November 2010, a motorist called 911 to report that he saw a man take a shotgun from the trunk of a car into a house in Riverton, Utah. Unified Police Department officers Kenneth C. Gates and Kenyon T. Madsen (defendants) responded to the call. Court documents further state that Robert Stoedter (plaintiff), who was relaxing on the front porch visiting with his uncle, matched the 911 caller’s description of the man with the shotgun; however, the defendants did not see a gun. Despite this, they approached with guns drawn, forced the men face down on the ground, and handcuffed them. They then learned he was returning with the shotgun from a hunting trip and released the two men from handcuffs.
Court documents further allege that the home was searched without a warrant or permission. Stoedter later sued the defendants, alleging that they violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure; as the 911 caller reported no crime, it is not unlawful to possess a shotgun in Utah, and the defendants had no reasonable suspicion of any crime at the moment they seized him. Judge Jenkins of the federal Utah District Court agreed, as did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which just affirmed, ruling that the defendants violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
“The Constitution guarantees each of us the right to ‘liberty,’ which includes freedom from police officers detaining us, absent reason to believe we’ve committed or are about to commit a crime,” said Huntsman, attorney for the plaintiff. “Simply possessing a gun is not enough to create such a belief. In fact, the right to ‘bear arms’ is a constitutional right. There has to be something more to justify the police treating a citizen like a criminal. The officers in this case simply did not have such justification. As a result, what they did violated Mr. Stoedter’s constitutional rights.”
Huntsman continued: “If the police are permitted to treat a phone call that mentions a gun as if there’s an automatic crime involved, then the 400,000-plus hunters in Utah, and all of us who associate with them, are in danger of being approached at gunpoint and handcuffed for no reason, like Mr. Stoedter and his uncle. The United States Constitution requires more than that from the police who swear to protect us. Hopefully this ruling will remind Utah officers of our rights, and their responsibilities, so that others are protected from similar or more serious injuries.”
About Diana J. Huntsman, Huntsman | Lofgran
Diana J. Huntsman is a senior partner of Huntsman | Lofgran, PLLC, licensed in the state of Utah for 23 years, and a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent-rated attorney. Practice areas of Huntsman | Lofgran, PLLC include personal injury, family law, bankruptcy, IRS and Utah tax law, business law, and estate planning and probate. For more information, please call (801) 474-0031, or visit http://www.hla-law.net. The law office is located at 623 E. Fort Union Boulevard, Suite 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84047.
About the NALA™
The NALA offers small and medium-sized businesses effective ways to reach customers through new media. As a single-agency source, the NALA helps businesses flourish in their local community. The NALA’s mission is to promote a business’ relevant and newsworthy events and achievements, both online and through traditional media. The information and content in this article are not in conjunction with the views of the NALA. For media inquiries, please call 805.650.6121, ext. 361.
THE NALA PR, Executive Business Services, http://www.thenala.com/, 805.650.6121, [email protected]
SOURCE Executive Business Services