Baltimore, Maryland (PRWEB) September 16, 2014 -- If we can better understand why and when medical malpractice occurs, we can focus efforts on reducing the occurrences and the effects of avoidable medical negligence that injure or kill many thousands of people in the United States every year.
The Doctors Company, the largest physician-owned medical malpractice insurer in the United States whose unabashed mission is to be “fiercely committed to relentlessly defending, protecting, and rewarding our members with the industry’s most aggressive claims defense, unrivaled protection, and innovative rewards,” recently published the findings of its review of 1,877 medical specialty-specific, diagnosis-related closed claims from 2007 to 2013, focusing on alleged diagnosis-related errors and the specific diagnoses that were involved in the claims involving ten medical specialties.
Diagnosis-related medical malpractice claims involve allegations of misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, failure to diagnose, and other related claims.
The review found that 31% of the nonsurgical specialty claims were related to diagnosis (which was the number one allegation in nonsurgical specialty claims) and that 11% of the surgical specialty claims were related to diagnosis, which was the third most common allegation in surgical claims.
The review of the closed claims for ten medical specialties during the stated period found the following:
Of the 1,647 orthopedic claims closed between 2007 and 2013, 13% (215) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of post-operative infection (11.2%) and cancer of the bone and soft tissue (5.6%).
Of the 1,134 family medicine claims, 37% (417) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of lung cancer (4.3%) and acute MI (4.3%).
Of the 986 internal medicine claims, 40% (374) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of lung cancer (6.4%) and acute MI (5.6%).
Of the 885 general surgery claims, 16% (143) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of puncture or laceration during a procedure (15.4%) and breast cancer (9.8%).
Of the 757 obstetrics claims, 9% (68) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy (17.6%) and postpartum hemorrhage (7.4%).
Of the 674 gynecology claims, 15% (98) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of breast cancer (21.4%) and puncture or laceration during a procedure (12.2%).
Of the 447 cardiology claims, 26% (114) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of acute MI (10.5%) and puncture or laceration during a procedure (6.1%).
Of the 414 emergency medicine claims, 58% (242) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of fracture (13.4%) and acute CVA (13.4%).
Of the 350 hospital medicine claims, 34% (118) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of acute CVA (8.5%) and acute MI (5.1%).
Of the 144 pediatrics claims, 61% (88) were diagnosis-related, with the greatest percentage involving the diagnosis of meningitis (8.0%) and pneumonia (4.5%).
Hence, of the 7,438 closed claims reviewed by The Doctors Company for ten specialties during the period from 2007 to 2013, 1,880 were diagnosis-related.
The reviewer suggests the primary cause of diagnostic errors is not a deficiency in knowledge (based on the finding that 52% of the top five diagnosis-related claims in each of the ten medical specialties were repeatedly found in different specialties) but other factors are involved, such as human-factors errors (impaired judgment, fatigue, or distractions); system-related errors due to poor communication or design flaws in electronic health records; failure to follow diagnostic protocols; failure to order appropriate diagnostic tests; failure to create a differential diagnosis; impaired synthesis of diagnostic data from sources such as medical history, physical examination, diagnostic tests, or consultations; narrowly focused diagnoses influenced by a known chronic illness; context errors; and, first-impression or intuition-based diagnoses.
About Us:
MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is the premier free website in the United States that connects medical malpractice victims with medical malpractice lawyers in their state.
MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com publishes a daily blog in which relevant and timely information and topics of interest are presented and discussed. Over 1,3000 consecutive daily blog postings have been published to date.
If you or a family member may be the victim of diagnosis-related medical negligence in the United States, you should promptly seek the legal advice of a local medical malpractice attorney in your state who may investigate your medical malpractice claim for you and represent you in a medical malpractice case, if appropriate.
Click here to visit our website to submit a short, secure form to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may assist you, or call us toll-free in the United States at 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
Jeff E. Messing, President, MML Holdings LLC, +1 (410) 576-8338, [email protected]
Share this article